All rise! Jurisdiction as Performance/Performative Language

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Steff Nellis
{"title":"All rise! Jurisdiction as Performance/Performative Language","authors":"Steff Nellis","doi":"10.2357/FMTH-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:When \"All rise!\" is being exclaimed in a courtroom, the attendees know they are supposed to stand up for the judges to enter. When these judges have made a decision at the end, the defendant becomes either guilty or not guilty. Yet, in a theatre hall, language lacks the specific coercive and punitive power to change reality directly. Nevertheless, lots of contemporary theatre and performance artists are implementing the stage to explore the relationship between law and theatre. This article seeks to examine the intricate role of language in both court cases and their fictional counterparts. Therefore, I will rely on Derrida's reassessment of Austin's Speech Act Theory (1962). To illustrate the argument, the importance of language in today's tribunal genre is being discussed for two performances that deal with alternative forms of jurisdiction: Milo Rau's The Congo Tribunal (2015) and Maria Lucia Cruz Correia's Voice of Nature: The Trial (2019).","PeriodicalId":55908,"journal":{"name":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","volume":"32 1","pages":"159 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2357/FMTH-2021-0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:When "All rise!" is being exclaimed in a courtroom, the attendees know they are supposed to stand up for the judges to enter. When these judges have made a decision at the end, the defendant becomes either guilty or not guilty. Yet, in a theatre hall, language lacks the specific coercive and punitive power to change reality directly. Nevertheless, lots of contemporary theatre and performance artists are implementing the stage to explore the relationship between law and theatre. This article seeks to examine the intricate role of language in both court cases and their fictional counterparts. Therefore, I will rely on Derrida's reassessment of Austin's Speech Act Theory (1962). To illustrate the argument, the importance of language in today's tribunal genre is being discussed for two performances that deal with alternative forms of jurisdiction: Milo Rau's The Congo Tribunal (2015) and Maria Lucia Cruz Correia's Voice of Nature: The Trial (2019).
全体起立!作为表演/表演语言的管辖权
摘要:当法庭上响起“全体起立”时,旁听者知道他们应该站起来等待法官进场。当这些法官最后作出裁决时,被告要么有罪,要么无罪。然而,在剧院大厅里,语言缺乏直接改变现实的特定强制性和惩罚性力量。然而,许多当代戏剧和行为艺术家都在通过舞台来探索法律与戏剧的关系。本文试图考察语言在法庭案件和虚构案件中的复杂作用。因此,我将依赖德里达对奥斯汀言语行为理论(1962)的重新评价。为了说明这一观点,两场涉及其他司法形式的表演讨论了语言在当今法庭类型中的重要性:米洛·劳的《刚果法庭》(2015)和玛丽亚·露西娅·克鲁兹·科雷亚的《自然之声:审判》(2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信