{"title":"The (Im)possibility of a New Cosmopolitanism? Damon Galgut’s Critique of Residual Cultural Scripts in The Impostor","authors":"S. Kostelac","doi":"10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses Damon Galgut’s 2008 novel, The Impostor, in light of recent critiques which argue that South African writing is beset by “repetition compulsions” (Boehmer 2018: 90) that betray the nation’s sublimated traumas and unhealable wounds. It argues that Galgut’s novel does not simply rehearse the tropes of South Africa’s literature of crisis, but rather subjects them to extended metafictional and ironic critique. Among the targets of Galgut’s satire is the state of petrified suspension that regualrly marks the white post-apartheid condition and which is undergirded, he shows, by a residual archive of pastoral and colonial scripts. These scripts make the realisation of what Paul Gilroy has called a “new cosmopolitanism” (2005: 287) in South Africa impossible, but they can be dispelled, the novel suggests, by cultivating modes of ironic self-awareness in which we come to understand our alterity as the very enabling condition of forming a life with others.","PeriodicalId":52015,"journal":{"name":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article analyses Damon Galgut’s 2008 novel, The Impostor, in light of recent critiques which argue that South African writing is beset by “repetition compulsions” (Boehmer 2018: 90) that betray the nation’s sublimated traumas and unhealable wounds. It argues that Galgut’s novel does not simply rehearse the tropes of South Africa’s literature of crisis, but rather subjects them to extended metafictional and ironic critique. Among the targets of Galgut’s satire is the state of petrified suspension that regualrly marks the white post-apartheid condition and which is undergirded, he shows, by a residual archive of pastoral and colonial scripts. These scripts make the realisation of what Paul Gilroy has called a “new cosmopolitanism” (2005: 287) in South Africa impossible, but they can be dispelled, the novel suggests, by cultivating modes of ironic self-awareness in which we come to understand our alterity as the very enabling condition of forming a life with others.
期刊介绍:
Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa is published bi-annually by Routledge. Current Writing focuses on recent writing and re-publication of texts on southern African and (from a ''southern'' perspective) commonwealth and/or postcolonial literature and literary-culture. Works of the past and near-past must be assessed and evaluated through the lens of current reception. Submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by at least two referees of international stature in the field. The journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.