The (Im)possibility of a New Cosmopolitanism? Damon Galgut’s Critique of Residual Cultural Scripts in The Impostor

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
S. Kostelac
{"title":"The (Im)possibility of a New Cosmopolitanism? Damon Galgut’s Critique of Residual Cultural Scripts in The Impostor","authors":"S. Kostelac","doi":"10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses Damon Galgut’s 2008 novel, The Impostor, in light of recent critiques which argue that South African writing is beset by “repetition compulsions” (Boehmer 2018: 90) that betray the nation’s sublimated traumas and unhealable wounds. It argues that Galgut’s novel does not simply rehearse the tropes of South Africa’s literature of crisis, but rather subjects them to extended metafictional and ironic critique. Among the targets of Galgut’s satire is the state of petrified suspension that regualrly marks the white post-apartheid condition and which is undergirded, he shows, by a residual archive of pastoral and colonial scripts. These scripts make the realisation of what Paul Gilroy has called a “new cosmopolitanism” (2005: 287) in South Africa impossible, but they can be dispelled, the novel suggests, by cultivating modes of ironic self-awareness in which we come to understand our alterity as the very enabling condition of forming a life with others.","PeriodicalId":52015,"journal":{"name":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1013929X.2020.1743030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article analyses Damon Galgut’s 2008 novel, The Impostor, in light of recent critiques which argue that South African writing is beset by “repetition compulsions” (Boehmer 2018: 90) that betray the nation’s sublimated traumas and unhealable wounds. It argues that Galgut’s novel does not simply rehearse the tropes of South Africa’s literature of crisis, but rather subjects them to extended metafictional and ironic critique. Among the targets of Galgut’s satire is the state of petrified suspension that regualrly marks the white post-apartheid condition and which is undergirded, he shows, by a residual archive of pastoral and colonial scripts. These scripts make the realisation of what Paul Gilroy has called a “new cosmopolitanism” (2005: 287) in South Africa impossible, but they can be dispelled, the novel suggests, by cultivating modes of ironic self-awareness in which we come to understand our alterity as the very enabling condition of forming a life with others.
新世界主义的可能性?达蒙·高古特对《骗子》中残余文化剧本的批判
本文分析了达蒙·加尔古特2008年的小说《冒名顶替者》,因为最近有评论认为,南非的写作受到“重复冲动”的困扰(Boehmer 2018:90),这些冲动暴露了这个国家升华的创伤和无法治愈的创伤。它认为,加尔古特的小说并不是简单地排练南非危机文学中的比喻,而是让它们接受延伸的元虚构和讽刺批判。加尔古特讽刺的目标之一是僵化的暂停状态,这通常标志着白人后种族隔离的状况,他表示,这是由残余的田园和殖民剧本档案所支撑的。这些剧本使保罗·吉尔罗伊(Paul Gilroy)所说的南非“新世界主义”(2005:287)不可能实现,但小说表明,通过培养讽刺性的自我意识模式,我们可以将自己的争吵理解为与他人形成生活的有利条件,这些剧本可以被消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa is published bi-annually by Routledge. Current Writing focuses on recent writing and re-publication of texts on southern African and (from a ''southern'' perspective) commonwealth and/or postcolonial literature and literary-culture. Works of the past and near-past must be assessed and evaluated through the lens of current reception. Submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by at least two referees of international stature in the field. The journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信