Deterrents to Viewing Indecent Images of Children Online: A Protocol for a Meta-Narrative Review

Emily Newman, E. Quayle, Laura A. Cariola, Karen Cooper, Nikolaos Koukopoulos, K. Beier, T. Squire, R. Wortley
{"title":"Deterrents to Viewing Indecent Images of Children Online: A Protocol for a Meta-Narrative Review","authors":"Emily Newman, E. Quayle, Laura A. Cariola, Karen Cooper, Nikolaos Koukopoulos, K. Beier, T. Squire, R. Wortley","doi":"10.7565/SSP.2018.2648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that the viewing of indecent images of children (IIOC) has increased due to the emergence of, and increased access to, the Internet. Over the last 20 years there has been a high level of collaboration between various stakeholders to prevent and restrict access to IIOC. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive review of these approaches or their effect as deterrents to viewing IIOC. \n \nMETHODS/DESIGN: This paper presents a protocol for a meta narrative review of the deterrents to viewing indecent images of children (IIOC) online. The meta narrative review methodology allows researchers to systematically identify and review different understandings, or narratives, of a subject across a range of disciplines, with the aim of synthesising this diverse literature and providing recommendations to researchers, practitioners and policymakers. We outline the authors’ approach to the review, focusing on six methodological steps: planning the review scope, questions and outputs, systematic searching of academic and grey literature, mapping the identified articles according to disciplines and their narratives, appraising the evidence within narratives, then synthesising the conceptualisations and evidence from the different disciplines to generate overarching narratives and recommendations to stakeholders. \n \nDISCUSSION: The discussion considers the anticipated benefits and challenges of conducting the review, and makes recommendations for other researchers embarking on this type of review.","PeriodicalId":74825,"journal":{"name":"Social science protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/SSP.2018.2648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that the viewing of indecent images of children (IIOC) has increased due to the emergence of, and increased access to, the Internet. Over the last 20 years there has been a high level of collaboration between various stakeholders to prevent and restrict access to IIOC. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive review of these approaches or their effect as deterrents to viewing IIOC. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper presents a protocol for a meta narrative review of the deterrents to viewing indecent images of children (IIOC) online. The meta narrative review methodology allows researchers to systematically identify and review different understandings, or narratives, of a subject across a range of disciplines, with the aim of synthesising this diverse literature and providing recommendations to researchers, practitioners and policymakers. We outline the authors’ approach to the review, focusing on six methodological steps: planning the review scope, questions and outputs, systematic searching of academic and grey literature, mapping the identified articles according to disciplines and their narratives, appraising the evidence within narratives, then synthesising the conceptualisations and evidence from the different disciplines to generate overarching narratives and recommendations to stakeholders. DISCUSSION: The discussion considers the anticipated benefits and challenges of conducting the review, and makes recommendations for other researchers embarking on this type of review.
在线观看儿童不雅图像的威慑:元叙事评论的协议
背景:证据表明,观看儿童不雅图像(IIOC)已经增加,由于出现和增加访问,互联网。在过去的20年里,各利益攸关方之间进行了高水平的合作,以防止和限制对IIOC的获取。然而,没有对这些方法或它们作为观看IIOC的威慑作用进行全面审查。方法/设计:本文提出了一种方案,对在线观看儿童不雅图像(IIOC)的威慑进行元叙事审查。元叙事回顾方法允许研究人员系统地识别和回顾不同的理解,或叙述,横跨一系列学科的主题,目的是综合这些不同的文献,并为研究人员,从业者和政策制定者提供建议。我们概述了作者的审查方法,重点关注六个方法步骤:规划审查范围,问题和产出,系统地搜索学术文献和灰色文献,根据学科及其叙述绘制已确定的文章,评估叙述中的证据,然后综合来自不同学科的概念化和证据,以生成总体叙述和向利益相关者提出建议。讨论:讨论考虑了进行综述的预期收益和挑战,并为其他研究人员进行此类综述提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信