THE LONG-TIME EFFECTS OF GROUP THERAPY INTERVENTION ON MARRIAGE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASIC PATIENTS AND THEIR SPOUSES: WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
Edyta Orłowska, Anna Rasmus, Jolanta Góral-Półrola, R. Morga, M. Pąchalska
{"title":"THE LONG-TIME EFFECTS OF GROUP THERAPY INTERVENTION ON MARRIAGE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASIC PATIENTS AND THEIR SPOUSES: WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?","authors":"Edyta Orłowska, Anna Rasmus, Jolanta Góral-Półrola, R. Morga, M. Pąchalska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0012.4700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study aims to assess the long-time effects of group therapy intervention on marriage communication between fluent and non-fluent aphasic patients and their spouses.\n\nFrom the initial cohort of 150 couples four experimental groups have been selected, each comprising 20 subjects: (1) patients with fluent aphasia (FAP) (2) patients with fluent aphasia spouses (FAPS) (3) patients with non-fluent aphasia (NFAP) (4) patients with non-fluent aphasia spouses (NFAPS). All aphasic patients had mild or moderate fluent or nonfluent aphasia, as confirmed by the Cracow Neuropsychological Battery for Aphasia Examination – CNBA (Pąchalska, 1999). To assess the 3 aspects of interactions between spouses: support, engagement and depreciation we use the Communication in Marriage Questionnaire – KKM scores (Kaźmierczak, Plopa, 2008). These patients attended the groups sessions administered according to Pąchalska’s Model of Aphasia Group Therapy (1991a; 1991b) .\n\nIt was found that after the long-time group intervention the experimental and the control groups of aphasic patients as well as their spouses differ one from another. NFAP as well as FAP therapy patients had higher KKM scores in the support received from their spouses and their spouses engagement in communication and lower scores in depreciation in their spouses’ behavior than did the controls. Also NFAPS evaluated support and engagement expressed by their aphasic partner higher than the control group. However FAPS and the control group KKM scores were quite similar, except for the support expressed by their aphasic partner.\n\nLong-time group therapy for patients with aphasia with the presence of caregivers not only improves the communication with significant others but also it is associated with better marital interactions and communication after therapy as reflected in the KKM scores than in the case of the controls, and improves the patient’s and caregivers’ perception of quality of life.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.4700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our study aims to assess the long-time effects of group therapy intervention on marriage communication between fluent and non-fluent aphasic patients and their spouses. From the initial cohort of 150 couples four experimental groups have been selected, each comprising 20 subjects: (1) patients with fluent aphasia (FAP) (2) patients with fluent aphasia spouses (FAPS) (3) patients with non-fluent aphasia (NFAP) (4) patients with non-fluent aphasia spouses (NFAPS). All aphasic patients had mild or moderate fluent or nonfluent aphasia, as confirmed by the Cracow Neuropsychological Battery for Aphasia Examination – CNBA (Pąchalska, 1999). To assess the 3 aspects of interactions between spouses: support, engagement and depreciation we use the Communication in Marriage Questionnaire – KKM scores (Kaźmierczak, Plopa, 2008). These patients attended the groups sessions administered according to Pąchalska’s Model of Aphasia Group Therapy (1991a; 1991b) . It was found that after the long-time group intervention the experimental and the control groups of aphasic patients as well as their spouses differ one from another. NFAP as well as FAP therapy patients had higher KKM scores in the support received from their spouses and their spouses engagement in communication and lower scores in depreciation in their spouses’ behavior than did the controls. Also NFAPS evaluated support and engagement expressed by their aphasic partner higher than the control group. However FAPS and the control group KKM scores were quite similar, except for the support expressed by their aphasic partner. Long-time group therapy for patients with aphasia with the presence of caregivers not only improves the communication with significant others but also it is associated with better marital interactions and communication after therapy as reflected in the KKM scores than in the case of the controls, and improves the patient’s and caregivers’ perception of quality of life.
团体治疗干预对流利与非流利失语患者及其配偶婚姻沟通的长期影响:谁受益最大?
我们的研究旨在评估群体治疗干预对流利和不流利失语症患者及其配偶之间婚姻沟通的长期影响。从150对夫妇的初始队列中选择了四个实验组,每个实验组包括20名受试者:(1)流利失语症患者(FAP)(2)流利失语配偶患者(FAPS)(3)非流利失语病患者(NFAP)(4)非流利失语症配偶患者(NFAPS)。所有失语症患者都有轻度或中度流利或非流利失语症,如Cracow失语症检查神经心理组(CNBA)所证实的(Pâchalska,1999)。为了评估配偶之间互动的三个方面:支持、订婚和贬值,我们使用了婚姻中的沟通问卷——KKM评分(Ka Roz mierczak,Plopa,2008)。这些患者参加了根据Pâchalska的失语症小组治疗模型(1991a;1991b)进行的小组治疗。研究发现,经过长期的群体干预,失语症患者及其配偶的实验组和对照组存在差异。与对照组相比,NFAP和FAP治疗患者在从配偶和配偶参与沟通中获得的支持方面的KKM得分更高,在配偶行为贬值方面的得分更低。此外,NFAPS评估失语症伴侣表达的支持和参与度高于对照组。然而,除了失语症伴侣表达的支持外,FAPS和对照组的KKM得分非常相似。有照顾者在场的失语症患者的长期集体治疗不仅改善了与重要他人的沟通,而且与对照组相比,KKM评分反映了治疗后更好的婚姻互动和沟通,并改善了患者和照顾者对生活质量的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信