Concordância inter-avaliador de testes musculoesqueléticos e viscerais para avaliar a região pélvica em mulheres com incontinência urinária de esforço

Q4 Medicine
Giselle Notini Arcânjo, Maurício Rocha Mendes, Andreazza de Abreu Cavalcante, P. Lima, José Vilaça-Alves
{"title":"Concordância inter-avaliador de testes musculoesqueléticos e viscerais para avaliar a região pélvica em mulheres com incontinência urinária de esforço","authors":"Giselle Notini Arcânjo, Maurício Rocha Mendes, Andreazza de Abreu Cavalcante, P. Lima, José Vilaça-Alves","doi":"10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.19014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accurate assessment of the pelvic region is necessary to provide reproducibility in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study, which is part of a randomized controlled trial, was to test the level of inter-examiner agreement of musculoskeletal and visceral tests to assess the pelvic region in women with stress urinary incontinence. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 20 women between 30 and 60 years old. Nine musculoskeletal tests were performed (standing and sitting flexion tests, Gillet test, iliac, sacral, and bladder position and mobility tests, psoas test, and abdomen assessment) and one pain provocation test for the sacroiliac joint (Patrick Faber test). Descriptive statistics were used, and the inter-examiner agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient (k). Significant agreement was found for the Patrick-Faber test and abdomen type (k = 0.649, p< 0.0001 and k = 0.342, p< 0.342, respectively). No significant agreement was observed in the remaining tests. In general, the tests' reproducibility in this study among evaluators to assess women's pelvic region with stress urinary incontinence is very weak.","PeriodicalId":53589,"journal":{"name":"Motricidade","volume":"16 1","pages":"255-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motricidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.19014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An accurate assessment of the pelvic region is necessary to provide reproducibility in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study, which is part of a randomized controlled trial, was to test the level of inter-examiner agreement of musculoskeletal and visceral tests to assess the pelvic region in women with stress urinary incontinence. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 20 women between 30 and 60 years old. Nine musculoskeletal tests were performed (standing and sitting flexion tests, Gillet test, iliac, sacral, and bladder position and mobility tests, psoas test, and abdomen assessment) and one pain provocation test for the sacroiliac joint (Patrick Faber test). Descriptive statistics were used, and the inter-examiner agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient (k). Significant agreement was found for the Patrick-Faber test and abdomen type (k = 0.649, p< 0.0001 and k = 0.342, p< 0.342, respectively). No significant agreement was observed in the remaining tests. In general, the tests' reproducibility in this study among evaluators to assess women's pelvic region with stress urinary incontinence is very weak.
肌肉骨骼和内脏测试评估压力性尿失禁妇女骨盆区域的评估者间一致性
骨盆区域的准确评估是必要的,以提供研究和临床实践的可重复性。本研究是一项随机对照试验的一部分,目的是测试检查者对评估压力性尿失禁妇女骨盆区域的肌肉骨骼和内脏检查的一致程度。对20名年龄在30至60岁之间的女性进行了一项横断面研究。进行了9项肌肉骨骼试验(站立和坐姿屈曲试验、Gillet试验、髂、骶和膀胱位置和活动试验、腰大肌试验和腹部评估)和1项骶髂关节疼痛激发试验(Patrick Faber试验)。采用描述性统计,采用Kappa系数(k)评估检查者间一致性。Patrick-Faber检验与腹部类型的一致性显著(k = 0.649, p< 0.0001; k = 0.342, p< 0.342)。在其余的试验中没有观察到显著的一致。总的来说,在本研究中评估女性盆腔区压力性尿失禁的评估者中,测试的可重复性非常弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Motricidade
Motricidade Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信