‘Me, a teacher?!’ – Professional role identification and role activation of psychology PhD students

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alessa Hillbrink, Regina Jucks
{"title":"‘Me, a teacher?!’ – Professional role identification and role activation of psychology PhD students","authors":"Alessa Hillbrink, Regina Jucks","doi":"10.1108/SGPE-03-2019-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDeveloping professional identities as both researchers and teachers is core to doctoral students’ growth. Given the primacy of research for the university career, this study aimed at answering the following questions: how much do doctoral students identify with the teacher compared to the researcher role? Can the teacher role identity be purposely activated?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn an experimental study with 167 psychology PhD students, trait role identification was measured using a questionnaire. Afterward, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions differing in the picture material (research vs teaching pictures vs a mixture of both) provided for creating a collage reflecting their roles. Subsequently, answers to open questions were coded and quantified as indicators of state role identity.\n\n\nFindings\nAs a trait, doctoral students identified more strongly with their researcher role than with their teacher role. Teacher role identity as a state was successfully activated when doctoral students engaged with teaching pictures compared to the other conditions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAs the researcher role seems to be the default setting for PhD students, activation of the teacher role has the potential to benefit work satisfaction of PhD students and the quality of their teaching.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTaking both long- and short-term identification processes in PhD students into account is a promising new approach. Besides, quantitative data are added to the field of qualitative insights on PhD students’ professional roles.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/SGPE-03-2019-0031","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-03-2019-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Developing professional identities as both researchers and teachers is core to doctoral students’ growth. Given the primacy of research for the university career, this study aimed at answering the following questions: how much do doctoral students identify with the teacher compared to the researcher role? Can the teacher role identity be purposely activated? Design/methodology/approach In an experimental study with 167 psychology PhD students, trait role identification was measured using a questionnaire. Afterward, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions differing in the picture material (research vs teaching pictures vs a mixture of both) provided for creating a collage reflecting their roles. Subsequently, answers to open questions were coded and quantified as indicators of state role identity. Findings As a trait, doctoral students identified more strongly with their researcher role than with their teacher role. Teacher role identity as a state was successfully activated when doctoral students engaged with teaching pictures compared to the other conditions. Practical implications As the researcher role seems to be the default setting for PhD students, activation of the teacher role has the potential to benefit work satisfaction of PhD students and the quality of their teaching. Originality/value Taking both long- and short-term identification processes in PhD students into account is a promising new approach. Besides, quantitative data are added to the field of qualitative insights on PhD students’ professional roles.
“我,当老师?!”——心理学博士生的职业角色识别与角色激活
目的培养研究人员和教师的职业身份是博士生成长的核心。鉴于研究在大学生涯中的首要地位,本研究旨在回答以下问题:与研究人员角色相比,博士生对教师角色的认同程度有多大?教师角色认同能否被有目的地激活?设计/方法/方法在对167名心理学博士生进行的一项实验研究中,采用问卷调查的方式测量了特质角色识别。之后,参与者被随机分配到三种不同的图片材料中的一种(研究与教学图片或两者的混合),为创造反映他们角色的拼贴画提供了条件。随后,对开放性问题的回答进行编码和量化,作为国家角色认同的指标。研究结果:作为一个特点,博士生更认同自己的研究人员角色,而不是教师角色。与其他条件相比,博士生参与教学图片时,教师角色认同状态被成功激活。由于研究者角色似乎是博士生的默认设置,激活教师角色有可能有利于博士生的工作满意度和他们的教学质量。同时考虑博士生的长期和短期识别过程是一种很有前途的新方法。此外,在对博士生职业角色进行定性分析的基础上,增加了定量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信