Proprioception assessment in stroke rehabilitation: A survey of Australian physiotherapists and occupational therapists

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
G. Fisher, C. Q. de Oliveira, A. Rochette, S. Gandevia, David S. Kennedy
{"title":"Proprioception assessment in stroke rehabilitation: A survey of Australian physiotherapists and occupational therapists","authors":"G. Fisher, C. Q. de Oliveira, A. Rochette, S. Gandevia, David S. Kennedy","doi":"10.3233/ppr-210597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Proprioception is the awareness of the position, movement, and muscular force generated by the body and its musculoskeletal parts, and is an important somatosensory impairment to assess in people with stroke. We know that rehabilitation clinicians self-report to assess proprioception in approximately two-thirds of people with stroke. What we do not know is what type of assessments are used, or the true frequency of their use in clinical practice. This study aimed to provide a preliminary description of the type and frequency of proprioception assessment used by clinicians working in stroke rehabilitation in Australia, and their knowledge about proprioception impairment. METHODS: We surveyed Australian physiotherapists and occupational therapists who were involved in the rehabilitation of people with stroke. The online cross-sectional survey ran from March to October 2020. While they were blind to the aims of the study, respondents answered questions about clinical decision-making in a case study of a person with stroke and proprioception impairment. Then, they were asked questions about proprioception. RESULTS: There was a total of 165 survey responses, of which 58 contained complete datasets suitable for analysis. Only 55% (n = 32) of respondents selected an assessment of proprioception for the person described in the case study. The majority of respondents defined proprioception to be the sense of joint / limb (n = 38, 65.5%) or body (n = 27, 46.6%) position and used ‘eyeball’ judgements of limb matching accuracy (56%, n = 33) as an assessment. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that proprioception is likely under-assessed in stroke rehabilitation and that clinicians understand proprioception to be the sense of joint position and movement, but lack awareness of other proprioceptive senses, such as the sense of muscle force. These factors may reduce the ability of clinicians to rehabilitate proprioception impairment in people with stroke.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-210597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proprioception is the awareness of the position, movement, and muscular force generated by the body and its musculoskeletal parts, and is an important somatosensory impairment to assess in people with stroke. We know that rehabilitation clinicians self-report to assess proprioception in approximately two-thirds of people with stroke. What we do not know is what type of assessments are used, or the true frequency of their use in clinical practice. This study aimed to provide a preliminary description of the type and frequency of proprioception assessment used by clinicians working in stroke rehabilitation in Australia, and their knowledge about proprioception impairment. METHODS: We surveyed Australian physiotherapists and occupational therapists who were involved in the rehabilitation of people with stroke. The online cross-sectional survey ran from March to October 2020. While they were blind to the aims of the study, respondents answered questions about clinical decision-making in a case study of a person with stroke and proprioception impairment. Then, they were asked questions about proprioception. RESULTS: There was a total of 165 survey responses, of which 58 contained complete datasets suitable for analysis. Only 55% (n = 32) of respondents selected an assessment of proprioception for the person described in the case study. The majority of respondents defined proprioception to be the sense of joint / limb (n = 38, 65.5%) or body (n = 27, 46.6%) position and used ‘eyeball’ judgements of limb matching accuracy (56%, n = 33) as an assessment. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that proprioception is likely under-assessed in stroke rehabilitation and that clinicians understand proprioception to be the sense of joint position and movement, but lack awareness of other proprioceptive senses, such as the sense of muscle force. These factors may reduce the ability of clinicians to rehabilitate proprioception impairment in people with stroke.
脑卒中康复中的本体感觉评估:澳大利亚物理治疗师和职业治疗师的调查
背景:本体感觉是对身体及其肌肉骨骼部位产生的位置、运动和肌肉力量的感知,是中风患者需要评估的一种重要的体感障碍。我们知道,康复临床医生自我报告,以评估大约三分之二的中风患者的本体感觉。我们不知道使用了什么类型的评估,也不知道它们在临床实践中的真实使用频率。本研究旨在初步描述澳大利亚从事中风康复工作的临床医生使用的本体感觉评估的类型和频率,以及他们对本体感觉障碍的了解。方法:我们调查了参与中风患者康复的澳大利亚物理治疗师和职业治疗师。这项在线横断面调查于2020年3月至10月进行。虽然他们对这项研究的目的视而不见,但在一项针对中风和本体感觉障碍患者的案例研究中,受访者回答了有关临床决策的问题。然后,他们被问到关于本体感觉的问题。结果:共有165份调查回复,其中58份包含适合分析的完整数据集。只有55%(n = 32)的受访者为案例研究中描述的人选择了本体感觉评估。大多数受访者将本体感觉定义为关节/肢体的感觉(n = 38.65.5%)或身体(n = 27,46.6%)的位置,并使用“眼球”判断肢体匹配的准确性(56%,n = 33)作为评估。结论:这些初步数据表明,本体感觉在中风康复中可能评估不足,临床医生将本体感觉理解为关节位置和运动感,但缺乏对其他本体感觉的认识,如肌肉力量感。这些因素可能会降低临床医生恢复中风患者本体感觉障碍的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信