Contingent resistance: The politics of waste commons in neoliberal Delhi

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Olivia Calleja
{"title":"Contingent resistance: The politics of waste commons in neoliberal Delhi","authors":"Olivia Calleja","doi":"10.1177/00699667211059715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Delhi’s neoliberal regime of solid waste management and the evolving and hybrid trajectory of appropriation that it gives rise to. Working with a commons/enclosure framework, I analyse how the privatisation of waste management unfolds amidst complex waste work community relations and dense labour politics to create contingent and unanticipated scenarios that modify the enclosure of waste. Specifically, I observe that circuits of exchange have developed in the shadow of privatised waste infrastructure and allow materials of value to escape into the informal recycling economy, despite modernisation blueprints planning for their capture by capitalist agents. This messy configuration urges us to nuance our comprehension of accumulation by dispossession in the context of Indian cities. In this article, I argue that variegated practices of commoning and enclosing underlie these everyday arrangements and the compromises on which they rest. This approach allows us to consider how (neo-) customary rights over the resources of waste and labour networks reconfigure under neoliberal regimes to condition the enclosing of waste commons. Finally, I suggest that situated histories and caste politics emerge as central features to understand the capitalist transformation of waste systems.","PeriodicalId":45175,"journal":{"name":"Contributions To Indian Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions To Indian Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00699667211059715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines Delhi’s neoliberal regime of solid waste management and the evolving and hybrid trajectory of appropriation that it gives rise to. Working with a commons/enclosure framework, I analyse how the privatisation of waste management unfolds amidst complex waste work community relations and dense labour politics to create contingent and unanticipated scenarios that modify the enclosure of waste. Specifically, I observe that circuits of exchange have developed in the shadow of privatised waste infrastructure and allow materials of value to escape into the informal recycling economy, despite modernisation blueprints planning for their capture by capitalist agents. This messy configuration urges us to nuance our comprehension of accumulation by dispossession in the context of Indian cities. In this article, I argue that variegated practices of commoning and enclosing underlie these everyday arrangements and the compromises on which they rest. This approach allows us to consider how (neo-) customary rights over the resources of waste and labour networks reconfigure under neoliberal regimes to condition the enclosing of waste commons. Finally, I suggest that situated histories and caste politics emerge as central features to understand the capitalist transformation of waste systems.
偶然抵抗:新自由主义德里的公共废物政治
本文考察了德里的新自由主义固体废物管理制度,以及由此产生的拨款的演变和混合轨迹,我分析了废物管理的私有化是如何在复杂的废物工作社区关系和密集的劳工政治中展开的,以创造偶然和意想不到的场景来改变废物的封闭。具体而言,我观察到,交换回路是在私有化废物基础设施的阴影下发展起来的,并允许有价值的材料流入非正规循环经济,尽管现代化蓝图计划被资本主义代理人捕获。这种混乱的配置促使我们在印度城市的背景下,通过剥夺来细致入微地理解积累。在这篇文章中,我认为,各种各样的共同和封闭的做法是这些日常安排及其所依据的妥协的基础。这种方法使我们能够考虑在新自由主义制度下,对废物资源和劳动力网络的(新)习惯权利是如何重新配置的,以限制对废物共同的封闭。最后,我建议情境历史和种姓政治成为理解资本主义废物系统转型的核心特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Contributions to Indian Sociology (CIS) is a peer-reviewed journal which has encouraged and fostered cutting-edge scholarship on South Asian societies and cultures over the last 50 years. Its features include research articles, short comments and book reviews. The journal also publishes special issues to highlight new and significant themes in the discipline. CIS invites articles on all countries of South Asia, the South Asian diaspora as well as on comparative studies related to the region. The journal favours articles in which theory and data are mutually related. It welcomes a diversity of theoretical approaches and methods. CIS was founded by Louis Dumont and David Pocock in 1957 but ceased publication in 1966. A new series commenced publication the next year (1967) at the initiative of T.N. Madan with the support of an international group of scholars including Professors Louis Dumont, A.C. Mayer, Milton Singer and M.N. Srinivas. Published annually till 1974, Contributions became a biannual publication in 1975. From 1999, the journal has been published thrice a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信