The Crush: A Practice of Not-Wanting-to-Seize

IF 0.5 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
S. Eager
{"title":"The Crush: A Practice of Not-Wanting-to-Seize","authors":"S. Eager","doi":"10.3366/count.2023.0294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interweaving personal experience, discussion of contemporary sexual ethics, and a meditation on Barthes’ Fragments, Sophie Eager considers the potential and limits of a touch which is indirect, mediated via an object, as a species of what Barthes calls le non-vouloir-saisir (not-wanting-to-seize). Addressing many of the motifs of these modes of contact in the Fragments, Eager extends this to discussion of the dynamics of interpretative violence, and resistance to such violence, in the intertextual networks that surround the Fragments, ultimately considering the Barthesian practice of reading as a practice of not-wanting-to-seize, preserving the freedom of the other.","PeriodicalId":42177,"journal":{"name":"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/count.2023.0294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interweaving personal experience, discussion of contemporary sexual ethics, and a meditation on Barthes’ Fragments, Sophie Eager considers the potential and limits of a touch which is indirect, mediated via an object, as a species of what Barthes calls le non-vouloir-saisir (not-wanting-to-seize). Addressing many of the motifs of these modes of contact in the Fragments, Eager extends this to discussion of the dynamics of interpretative violence, and resistance to such violence, in the intertextual networks that surround the Fragments, ultimately considering the Barthesian practice of reading as a practice of not-wanting-to-seize, preserving the freedom of the other.
迷恋:一种不想抓住的实践
Sophie Eagle将个人经历、对当代性伦理的讨论和对Barthes碎片的思考交织在一起,认为通过物体介导的间接触摸的潜力和局限性是Barthes所说的“不想抓住”的一种。针对《碎片》中这些接触模式的许多主题,伊格尔将其扩展到讨论解释性暴力的动态,以及在围绕《碎片》的互文网络中对这种暴力的抵制,最终将巴特的阅读实践视为一种不想抓住、保护他人自由的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信