Response to Otto Kernberg

Q3 Psychology
M. Solms
{"title":"Response to Otto Kernberg","authors":"M. Solms","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It gives me great pleasure to respond to Otto Kernberg’s commentary on my “New Project for a Scientific Psychology” (2020). It is gratifying to receive praise from a psychoanalyst of his stature. Many other leading colleagues are still ideologically opposed to neuropsychoanalysis, which is nothing short of tragic for the future of psychoanalysis. Hopefully this commentary will persuade some of them to rethink their positions. In my response, however, I will focus on the few areas of disagreement between Kernberg and me.","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"23 1","pages":"115 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT It gives me great pleasure to respond to Otto Kernberg’s commentary on my “New Project for a Scientific Psychology” (2020). It is gratifying to receive praise from a psychoanalyst of his stature. Many other leading colleagues are still ideologically opposed to neuropsychoanalysis, which is nothing short of tragic for the future of psychoanalysis. Hopefully this commentary will persuade some of them to rethink their positions. In my response, however, I will focus on the few areas of disagreement between Kernberg and me.
对Otto Kernberg的回应
摘要很高兴回应Otto Kernberg对我的“科学心理学新项目”(2020)的评论。能得到像他这样的精神分析学家的赞扬是令人欣慰的。许多其他主要同事仍然在意识形态上反对神经精神分析,这对精神分析的未来来说无异于悲剧。希望这篇评论能说服他们中的一些人重新思考自己的立场。然而,在我的回应中,我将重点谈谈克恩伯格和我之间存在分歧的几个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychoanalysis
Neuropsychoanalysis Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信