Comparative analysis of two leading evolutionary intelligence approaches for multilevel thresholding

IF 0.6 Q3 Engineering
Z. Ye, Hang Yin, Yongmao Ye
{"title":"Comparative analysis of two leading evolutionary intelligence approaches for multilevel thresholding","authors":"Z. Ye, Hang Yin, Yongmao Ye","doi":"10.1504/IJSISE.2018.10011687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid advance of artificial intelligence has made complex image processing in real time possible. Multilevel thresholding has become a feasible way for image segmentation, even in the presence of poor contrast and external artefacts. Genetic algorithms (GAs) and particle swarm optimisation (PSO) are broadly recognised by far to be two dominating schemes which outperform classical ones on multilevel thresholding. Qualitative analysis can usually be applied to observe their superiority to all classical approaches. However, no convincing result is reached with respect to differences in performance between GAs and PSO. The existing segmentation practices are either examined by visual appeals exclusively, or evaluated quantitatively assuming perfect statistical distributions. To make thorough comparisons, comparative analysis of two leading multilevel thresholding approaches is conducted for true colour image segmentation. The information theory is also employed to analyse the outcomes of systematic approaches using diverse quantitative metrics from various aspects.","PeriodicalId":56359,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSISE.2018.10011687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The rapid advance of artificial intelligence has made complex image processing in real time possible. Multilevel thresholding has become a feasible way for image segmentation, even in the presence of poor contrast and external artefacts. Genetic algorithms (GAs) and particle swarm optimisation (PSO) are broadly recognised by far to be two dominating schemes which outperform classical ones on multilevel thresholding. Qualitative analysis can usually be applied to observe their superiority to all classical approaches. However, no convincing result is reached with respect to differences in performance between GAs and PSO. The existing segmentation practices are either examined by visual appeals exclusively, or evaluated quantitatively assuming perfect statistical distributions. To make thorough comparisons, comparative analysis of two leading multilevel thresholding approaches is conducted for true colour image segmentation. The information theory is also employed to analyse the outcomes of systematic approaches using diverse quantitative metrics from various aspects.
两种领先的进化智能多级阈值方法的比较分析
人工智能的快速发展使得实时处理复杂图像成为可能。多级阈值分割已成为一种可行的图像分割方法,即使在存在对比度差和外部伪影的情况下也是如此。遗传算法(GAs)和粒子群算法(PSO)是目前公认的两种优于经典阈值算法的主流算法。定性分析通常可以用来观察它们相对于所有经典方法的优越性。然而,关于GAs和PSO之间的性能差异,没有得出令人信服的结果。现有的分割实践要么是通过视觉吸引力进行检查,要么是在假设完美的统计分布的情况下进行定量评估。为了进行全面的比较,对两种领先的多级阈值分割方法进行了比较分析。信息论也被用来分析系统方法的结果,使用不同的定量指标从各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信