Proposed Criteria for Assessment of Student Learning when Introducing New Manual Skills into the Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education Program

Q1 Nursing
Tiffany Enache , Yuri Yoshida , Vicky Saliba Johnson
{"title":"Proposed Criteria for Assessment of Student Learning when Introducing New Manual Skills into the Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education Program","authors":"Tiffany Enache ,&nbsp;Yuri Yoshida ,&nbsp;Vicky Saliba Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2020.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Physical therapy educators are responsible for ensuring that learners demonstrate sufficient skill acquisition for safe and effective clinical practice, which includes the learners’ ability to execute manual skills in a reliable and accurate manner. This study is the first attempt to assist physical therapy educators in assessing the feasibility of including new manual skills in the educational curriculum by using criteria for assessment of student learning. An example using these criteria is illustrated by a pilot experiment using the Vertical Compression Test (VCT) and Saliba Postural Classification System (SPCS), which are currently taught predominantly at the post-graduate level.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Physical therapy students (SPT) were trained in the VCT and SPCS during the first year of the educational curriculum. Six SPTs and two experienced clinicians (PT) participated in the experiment. An SPT and a PT applied the VCT to subjects in their normal resting posture (PPre) and in a corrected posture (PCor). Data collection measured quantity of force, duration of application, subjects' sway, SPT/PT interpretation of test results, and students’ confidence in order to determine feasibility of inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no differences in quantified manual compression forces with a significant correlation between SPT and PT. Movements of the center of pressure indicated test subjects stood steadier during VCT performed by PT compared to SPT, but not to a clinically significant degree. Interpretation of VCT and SPCS test results was excluded as a focus of this study due to curricular limitations that influenced the study design. Student feedback indicated satisfaction with the learning experience.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The use of the proposed criteria for assessment of student learning confirmed feasibility of inclusion of the VCT in the entry-level physical therapy education curriculum. First-year DPT students demonstrated ability to perform the VCT with appropriate technique after minimal training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 581-593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245230112030064X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Physical therapy educators are responsible for ensuring that learners demonstrate sufficient skill acquisition for safe and effective clinical practice, which includes the learners’ ability to execute manual skills in a reliable and accurate manner. This study is the first attempt to assist physical therapy educators in assessing the feasibility of including new manual skills in the educational curriculum by using criteria for assessment of student learning. An example using these criteria is illustrated by a pilot experiment using the Vertical Compression Test (VCT) and Saliba Postural Classification System (SPCS), which are currently taught predominantly at the post-graduate level.

Method

Physical therapy students (SPT) were trained in the VCT and SPCS during the first year of the educational curriculum. Six SPTs and two experienced clinicians (PT) participated in the experiment. An SPT and a PT applied the VCT to subjects in their normal resting posture (PPre) and in a corrected posture (PCor). Data collection measured quantity of force, duration of application, subjects' sway, SPT/PT interpretation of test results, and students’ confidence in order to determine feasibility of inclusion.

Results

There were no differences in quantified manual compression forces with a significant correlation between SPT and PT. Movements of the center of pressure indicated test subjects stood steadier during VCT performed by PT compared to SPT, but not to a clinically significant degree. Interpretation of VCT and SPCS test results was excluded as a focus of this study due to curricular limitations that influenced the study design. Student feedback indicated satisfaction with the learning experience.

Discussion

The use of the proposed criteria for assessment of student learning confirmed feasibility of inclusion of the VCT in the entry-level physical therapy education curriculum. First-year DPT students demonstrated ability to perform the VCT with appropriate technique after minimal training.

在入门级物理治疗师教育计划中引入新的手工技能时评估学生学习的建议标准
目的物理治疗教育者有责任确保学习者表现出足够的技能获得安全有效的临床实践,其中包括学习者以可靠和准确的方式执行手动技能的能力。本研究首次尝试以学生学习评估标准,协助物理治疗教育者评估将新手工技能纳入教育课程的可行性。一个使用垂直压缩测试(VCT)和Saliba姿势分类系统(SPCS)的试点实验说明了这些标准的一个例子,这两个系统目前主要在研究生阶段教授。方法在第一年的教育课程中对物理治疗学生进行VCT和SPCS的培训。6名SPTs和2名经验丰富的临床医生(PT)参加了实验。SPT和PT分别对处于正常休息姿势(PPre)和矫正姿势(PCor)的受试者应用VCT。数据收集测量了力的量、施加时间、受试者的摇摆、测试结果的SPT/PT解释和学生的信心,以确定纳入的可行性。结果在量化的手压力方面,SPT和PT没有差异,且有显著的相关性。压力中心的运动表明,与SPT相比,PT进行VCT时,受试者站立更稳定,但没有达到临床显著的程度。由于课程限制影响了研究设计,VCT和SPCS测试结果的解释被排除在本研究的重点之外。学生的反馈表明他们对学习体验很满意。使用所提出的评估学生学习的标准证实了将VCT纳入初级物理治疗教育课程的可行性。一年级的DPT学生在经过简单的训练后,表现出了使用适当技术进行VCT的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信