Norge Vergara MD, Roseann I. Wu MD, MPH, Stuti Shroff MD, PhD, Cindy M. McGrath MD
{"title":"Cytology and histology: Complementary diagnostic modalities during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition","authors":"Norge Vergara MD, Roseann I. Wu MD, MPH, Stuti Shroff MD, PhD, Cindy M. McGrath MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tgie.2017.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has become the preferred method of sampling accessible intraintestinal and extraintestinal abdominal masses<span>, as well as peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy. Despite the success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-FNA, there are settings in which </span></span>FNA<span><span> appears to underperform when compared to other techniques. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA, endoscopists have used small-gauge cutting and core needle biopsies<span> in conjunction with or as an alternative to FNA. This review, from the pathologists′ perspective, will cover these complementary techniques, including definitions, advantages, and limitations, as well as the role of rapid on-site evaluation. Our conclusions include that cytologic specimens, which use alcohol-based fixation during processing, appear preferable for molecular testing that relies on nucleic acid preservation, such as next-generation sequencing. However, core biopsy should be considered when </span></span>immunohistochemistry and tissue architectural details are required for diagnosis.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":43887,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tgie.2017.10.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096288317300803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has become the preferred method of sampling accessible intraintestinal and extraintestinal abdominal masses, as well as peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy. Despite the success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-FNA, there are settings in which FNA appears to underperform when compared to other techniques. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA, endoscopists have used small-gauge cutting and core needle biopsies in conjunction with or as an alternative to FNA. This review, from the pathologists′ perspective, will cover these complementary techniques, including definitions, advantages, and limitations, as well as the role of rapid on-site evaluation. Our conclusions include that cytologic specimens, which use alcohol-based fixation during processing, appear preferable for molecular testing that relies on nucleic acid preservation, such as next-generation sequencing. However, core biopsy should be considered when immunohistochemistry and tissue architectural details are required for diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of each issue of Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is to provide a comprehensive, current overview of a clinical condition or surgical procedure in gastrointestinal endoscopy, combining the effectiveness of an atlas with the timeliness of a journal. Each issue places a vigorous emphasis on diagnosis, rationale for and against a procedure, actual technique, management, and prevention of complications. The journal features abundant illustrations, line drawings and color artwork to guide readers through even the most complicated procedure.