Is Utilizing a Modular Stemmed Tibial Component in Obese Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Replacement Cost-Effective?

J. R. Martin, Jesse E. Otero, W. B. Beaver, B. Springer, W. Griffin
{"title":"Is Utilizing a Modular Stemmed Tibial Component in Obese Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Replacement Cost-Effective?","authors":"J. R. Martin, Jesse E. Otero, W. B. Beaver, B. Springer, W. Griffin","doi":"10.15438/RR.8.2.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There has been recent enthusiasm for the use of modular stemmed tibial components in obese (BMI ≥35kg/m2) patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This has been mainly driven by studies demonstrating statistically significant increases in the rates of aseptic tibial loosening (ATL) in this patient population. However, to our knowledge, no study has specifically evaluated the cost effectiveness of this current recommendation.Methods: The following study was performed utilizing previously obtained data on the incidence of ATL in obese patients undergoing primary TKA. This data was then utilized to create a cost calculator that can evaluate the price point at which the use of a stemmed tibial component in all obese patients would be less than or equal to the costs of revision surgery if a stemmed implant was not utilized.Results: Utilizing historical data with a revision rate of 4% for aseptic loosening of the tibia on obese patients, a cost calculator was developed. The cost calculator requires the input of expected or known incidence of ATL utilizing a stem extension and the expected or known costs of revision for ATL.Conclusion: The following cost calculator quickly determines a price point at which the use of a tibial stem offsets the costs of revision surgery. While this study may not provide an exact cost-effectiveness of modular stem fixation due to model limitations, it will hopefully initiate the discussion for providing more cost-effective individualized care for this patient population.","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.8.2.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: There has been recent enthusiasm for the use of modular stemmed tibial components in obese (BMI ≥35kg/m2) patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This has been mainly driven by studies demonstrating statistically significant increases in the rates of aseptic tibial loosening (ATL) in this patient population. However, to our knowledge, no study has specifically evaluated the cost effectiveness of this current recommendation.Methods: The following study was performed utilizing previously obtained data on the incidence of ATL in obese patients undergoing primary TKA. This data was then utilized to create a cost calculator that can evaluate the price point at which the use of a stemmed tibial component in all obese patients would be less than or equal to the costs of revision surgery if a stemmed implant was not utilized.Results: Utilizing historical data with a revision rate of 4% for aseptic loosening of the tibia on obese patients, a cost calculator was developed. The cost calculator requires the input of expected or known incidence of ATL utilizing a stem extension and the expected or known costs of revision for ATL.Conclusion: The following cost calculator quickly determines a price point at which the use of a tibial stem offsets the costs of revision surgery. While this study may not provide an exact cost-effectiveness of modular stem fixation due to model limitations, it will hopefully initiate the discussion for providing more cost-effective individualized care for this patient population.
在接受初次全膝关节置换术的肥胖患者中使用模块化固定胫骨组件是否经济有效?
引言:最近,在接受初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)的肥胖(BMI≥35kg/m2)患者中,人们热衷于使用模块化胫骨干假体。这主要是由于研究表明,该患者群体中无菌性胫骨松动(ATL)的发生率在统计学上显著增加。然而,据我们所知,没有任何研究专门评估当前建议的成本效益。方法:利用先前获得的关于接受原发性TKA的肥胖患者ATL发病率的数据进行以下研究。然后利用这些数据创建一个成本计算器,该计算器可以评估在所有肥胖患者中使用带茎胫骨组件的价格点,如果不使用带茎植入物,该价格点将小于或等于翻修手术的成本。结果:利用肥胖患者胫骨无菌性松动的修订率为4%的历史数据,开发了一个成本计算器。成本计算器需要输入预期或已知的利用柄延长的ATL发生率以及预期或已知ATL翻修成本。结论:以下成本计算器可以快速确定使用胫骨柄抵消翻修手术成本的价格点。虽然由于模型的限制,这项研究可能无法提供模块化干细胞固定的确切成本效益,但它有望为该患者群体提供更具成本效益的个性化护理展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信