Survey to Mental Health Professionals on Problematic Drug Use

IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine
J. C. Tenconi, Federico Pavlovsky, O. M. Cesoni, Viviana A. Peskin
{"title":"Survey to Mental Health Professionals on Problematic Drug Use","authors":"J. C. Tenconi, Federico Pavlovsky, O. M. Cesoni, Viviana A. Peskin","doi":"10.1097/ADT.0000000000000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: When discussing problematic drug use it is necessary to articulate both the legal and the health system to establish a coherent approach to address it. As the health system is formed in part by the Mental Health professionals who are usually those who respond to and receive this population for treatment, the aim of the present study was to learn their opinion with regard to problematic drug use approach both clinically and in the legal system. The results would help to stimulate discussion in the Mental Health field to better assist policy makers. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample. During the 2017 Argentinian Conference on Psychiatry (Congreso Argentino de Psiquiatría XXXII from Asociación de Psiquiatras Argentinos), the attendees received an anonymous voluntary paper questionnaire designed by the research team that had 4 questions on demographic information and 9 Likert-like statements. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 642 attendees answered the questionnaire. As regards criminalization of drug use, 51.7% would decriminalize ≥1 drug, 42.5% disagreed that the aim of the treatment is total abstinence (those that disagreed had a statistically significantly lower mean age compared with those that agreed), and 64.5% disagreed with punishing drug possession for personal use. Conclusions: The debate taking place worldwide on how to address the drug use problem could also be found among the Mental Health professionals in Argentina, where almost half considered that ban is the best approach, whereas the other half was in favor of decriminalization. Creating consensus among Mental Health providers would allow better articulation of the health system, with the policy makers giving a comprehensive approach in these complex situations.","PeriodicalId":44600,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment","volume":"19 1","pages":"30 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ADT.0000000000000177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADT.0000000000000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: When discussing problematic drug use it is necessary to articulate both the legal and the health system to establish a coherent approach to address it. As the health system is formed in part by the Mental Health professionals who are usually those who respond to and receive this population for treatment, the aim of the present study was to learn their opinion with regard to problematic drug use approach both clinically and in the legal system. The results would help to stimulate discussion in the Mental Health field to better assist policy makers. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample. During the 2017 Argentinian Conference on Psychiatry (Congreso Argentino de Psiquiatría XXXII from Asociación de Psiquiatras Argentinos), the attendees received an anonymous voluntary paper questionnaire designed by the research team that had 4 questions on demographic information and 9 Likert-like statements. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 642 attendees answered the questionnaire. As regards criminalization of drug use, 51.7% would decriminalize ≥1 drug, 42.5% disagreed that the aim of the treatment is total abstinence (those that disagreed had a statistically significantly lower mean age compared with those that agreed), and 64.5% disagreed with punishing drug possession for personal use. Conclusions: The debate taking place worldwide on how to address the drug use problem could also be found among the Mental Health professionals in Argentina, where almost half considered that ban is the best approach, whereas the other half was in favor of decriminalization. Creating consensus among Mental Health providers would allow better articulation of the health system, with the policy makers giving a comprehensive approach in these complex situations.
心理健康专业人员吸毒问题调查
引言:在讨论有问题的药物使用时,有必要阐明法律和卫生系统,以建立一种连贯的方法来解决这一问题。由于卫生系统在一定程度上是由心理健康专业人员组成的,他们通常是对这一人群做出反应并接受治疗的人,本研究的目的是了解他们对临床和法律体系中存在问题的药物使用方法的看法。研究结果将有助于激发心理健康领域的讨论,更好地帮助决策者。材料和方法:这是一项具有方便样本的横断面研究。在2017年阿根廷精神病学会议(阿根廷精神病学会第三十二届阿根廷精神病大会)期间,与会者收到了一份由研究团队设计的匿名自愿纸质问卷,其中有4个关于人口统计信息的问题和9个类似Likert的陈述。进行统计分析。结果:共有642名与会者回答了问卷。关于吸毒的刑事定罪,51.7%的人会将≥1种药物非刑罪化,42.5%的人不同意治疗的目的是完全禁欲(与同意的人相比,不同意的人的平均年龄在统计上显著降低),64.5%的人反对惩罚个人持有毒品。结论:世界各地关于如何解决药物使用问题的辩论也可以在阿根廷的心理健康专业人员中找到,那里几乎一半的人认为禁令是最好的方法,而另一半人则赞成非刑事化。在心理健康提供者之间达成共识将有助于更好地阐明卫生系统,政策制定者将在这些复杂的情况下采取全面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment is a quarterly international journal devoted to practical clinical research and treatment issues related to the misuses of alcohol and licit and illicit drugs and the study and treatment of addictive disorders and their behaviors. The journal publishes broad-spectrum, patient-oriented coverage of all aspects of addiction, directed toward an audience of psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychopharmacologists, and primary care practitioners. Original articles help clinicians make more educated, effective decisions regarding optimal patient management and care. In-depth reviews examine current understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of addiction disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信