Correction: Growing up, growing out: comparing spatial patterns of urban populations in Canada

Q3 Social Sciences
Geomatica Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1139/geomat-2019-0011
Jiaao Guo, Victoria Fast
{"title":"Correction: Growing up, growing out: comparing spatial patterns of urban populations in Canada","authors":"Jiaao Guo, Victoria Fast","doi":"10.1139/geomat-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spatial distribution of population and related density characteristics has a significant impact on urban form; a low-density urban form is typically associated with low efficiency of service delivery, poor connectivity between communities, and a high tendency of urban sprawl, whereas higher density urban form is associated with transit-oriented development, efficient service delivery, and lower overall infrastructure costs. However, an urban area is never a homogenous environment. Depending on the general community designs, natural barriers, and massive functional infrastructures (airports, large parks), the urban population be may spread out evenly or condensed into some disjointed, isolated clusters. Given the context that Canadian cities have typically low population densities, their population distributions are subject to high spatial variabilities. We use geographic information system (GIS) techniques and geostatistical approaches (Getis–Ord [Formula: see text] hot spot analysis and HDBSCAN) to visualize and compare sub-municipal level population density of the 10 most populous census subdivisions (CSDs) in Canada. Results reveal both low-density forms and density segmentations in most municipalities, especially those without a natural or political border to constrain growth. Population segmentation is sometimes unsolvable due to natural landscapes or massive infrastructures initially planned by local municipalities; however, segmentations may be mitigated if future growth strategies maximize existing population clusters.","PeriodicalId":35938,"journal":{"name":"Geomatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/geomat-2019-0011","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/geomat-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The spatial distribution of population and related density characteristics has a significant impact on urban form; a low-density urban form is typically associated with low efficiency of service delivery, poor connectivity between communities, and a high tendency of urban sprawl, whereas higher density urban form is associated with transit-oriented development, efficient service delivery, and lower overall infrastructure costs. However, an urban area is never a homogenous environment. Depending on the general community designs, natural barriers, and massive functional infrastructures (airports, large parks), the urban population be may spread out evenly or condensed into some disjointed, isolated clusters. Given the context that Canadian cities have typically low population densities, their population distributions are subject to high spatial variabilities. We use geographic information system (GIS) techniques and geostatistical approaches (Getis–Ord [Formula: see text] hot spot analysis and HDBSCAN) to visualize and compare sub-municipal level population density of the 10 most populous census subdivisions (CSDs) in Canada. Results reveal both low-density forms and density segmentations in most municipalities, especially those without a natural or political border to constrain growth. Population segmentation is sometimes unsolvable due to natural landscapes or massive infrastructures initially planned by local municipalities; however, segmentations may be mitigated if future growth strategies maximize existing population clusters.
修正:成长,成长:比较加拿大城市人口的空间格局
人口的空间分布及相关密度特征对城市形态有显著影响;低密度城市形态通常与服务提供效率低、社区之间的连通性差和城市蔓延的高趋势有关,而高密度城市形态与以交通为导向的发展、高效的服务提供和较低的整体基础设施成本有关。然而,城市地区从来都不是一个同质的环境。根据一般的社区设计、自然屏障和大规模的功能性基础设施(机场、大型公园),城市人口可能会均匀分布,也可能会聚集成一些脱节、孤立的集群。鉴于加拿大城市通常人口密度较低,其人口分布具有较高的空间变异性。我们使用地理信息系统(GIS)技术和地质统计学方法(Getis–Ord[公式:见正文]热点分析和HDBSCAN)来可视化和比较加拿大人口最多的10个人口普查分区(CSD)的次市级人口密度。结果揭示了大多数城市的低密度形式和密度分割,尤其是那些没有自然或政治边界来限制增长的城市。由于自然景观或地方市政当局最初规划的大规模基础设施,人口分割有时无法解决;然而,如果未来的增长策略最大限度地扩大现有的人口集群,细分可能会得到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomatica
Geomatica Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Geomatica (formerly CISM Journal ACSGC), is the official quarterly publication of the Canadian Institute of Geomatics. It is the oldest surveying and mapping publication in Canada and was first published in 1922 as the Journal of the Dominion Land Surveyors’ Association. Geomatica is dedicated to the dissemination of information on technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The internationally respected publication contains special features, notices of conferences, calendar of event, articles on personalities, review of current books, industry news and new products, all of which keep the publication lively and informative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信