Implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management Review (CMR) in the Ambulatory Care Setting

G. Andrew, Philips Ashmi A, Casias Michael, Philips Navin, Prosswimmer Geralyn M
{"title":"Implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management Review (CMR) in the Ambulatory Care Setting","authors":"G. Andrew, Philips Ashmi A, Casias Michael, Philips Navin, Prosswimmer Geralyn M","doi":"10.23937/2469-5858/1510082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this project was to conduct pharmacotherapeutic management of patients in the outpatient setting in a standardized manner. A CMR program was implemented at select ambulatory care sites within our healthcare system. This review identified and addressed medication-related concerns in order to optimize disease state management and attain positive patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective review included patients 80 years or older with polypharmacy concerns, categorized as having greater than 10 medications. Evaluation assessed for therapeutic duplications, potential interactions, side effects, inappropriate medications in the elderly, pharmacoeconomic issues and adherence concerns. All data was collected through the outpatient electronic health record. The primary outcome was the number and type of interventions identified through CMR. Secondary outcomes included percent of recommendations accepted, reasons for rejection, types of recommendations, and disease states intervened on. Results: Out of a total of 222 patients, 52 patients did not require any interventions and 250 recommendations were made to the providers on the 170 remaining patients. Currently 82% of recommendations were accepted by providers, with 17% still pending provider acknowledgement, and 1% being rejected. A large majority, 141 recommendations, were made in regards to high risk medications. Conclusion: CMR was shown to be highly effective in identifying appropriate medication interventions in order to optimize patient care. This study provided the framework to move pharmacists into other outpatient sites in the healthcare setting to assist in targeting inappropriate prescribing in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":91314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this project was to conduct pharmacotherapeutic management of patients in the outpatient setting in a standardized manner. A CMR program was implemented at select ambulatory care sites within our healthcare system. This review identified and addressed medication-related concerns in order to optimize disease state management and attain positive patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective review included patients 80 years or older with polypharmacy concerns, categorized as having greater than 10 medications. Evaluation assessed for therapeutic duplications, potential interactions, side effects, inappropriate medications in the elderly, pharmacoeconomic issues and adherence concerns. All data was collected through the outpatient electronic health record. The primary outcome was the number and type of interventions identified through CMR. Secondary outcomes included percent of recommendations accepted, reasons for rejection, types of recommendations, and disease states intervened on. Results: Out of a total of 222 patients, 52 patients did not require any interventions and 250 recommendations were made to the providers on the 170 remaining patients. Currently 82% of recommendations were accepted by providers, with 17% still pending provider acknowledgement, and 1% being rejected. A large majority, 141 recommendations, were made in regards to high risk medications. Conclusion: CMR was shown to be highly effective in identifying appropriate medication interventions in order to optimize patient care. This study provided the framework to move pharmacists into other outpatient sites in the healthcare setting to assist in targeting inappropriate prescribing in the elderly.
综合用药管理评价(CMR)在门诊护理中的实施
背景:本项目的目的是以标准化的方式对门诊患者进行药物治疗管理。CMR计划在我们医疗保健系统内的选定门诊护理点实施。这篇综述确定并解决了与药物相关的问题,以优化疾病状态管理并获得积极的患者结果。方法:这项前瞻性综述包括80岁或以上有多种药物问题的患者,分类为服用10种以上药物。评估治疗重复、潜在相互作用、副作用、老年人不适当的药物、药物经济学问题和依从性问题。所有数据都是通过门诊电子健康记录收集的。主要结果是通过CMR确定的干预措施的数量和类型。次要结果包括接受建议的百分比、拒绝的原因、建议的类型和干预的疾病状态。结果:在222名患者中,52名患者不需要任何干预,其余170名患者向提供者提出了250条建议。目前,82%的建议被提供者接受,17%的建议仍有待提供者确认,1%的建议被拒绝。绝大多数(141项建议)是针对高危药物提出的。结论:CMR在确定适当的药物干预措施以优化患者护理方面非常有效。这项研究提供了一个框架,将药剂师转移到医疗环境中的其他门诊点,以帮助针对老年人的不当处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信