Socially valid tools: Sloydtrukk and co-crafting togetherness

IF 0.3 0 ART
H. Hansson, Otto von Busch
{"title":"Socially valid tools: Sloydtrukk and co-crafting togetherness","authors":"H. Hansson, Otto von Busch","doi":"10.1386/crre_00094_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the footsteps of specialization as well as studio crafts, making is commonly thought of as a solitary practice. The term do-it-yourself (DIY) emphasizes the singular and practical maker, empowered by his or her skills, taking action where deemed necessary. Along similar lines, tools are designed for the use by this lone maker, who seldom asks for assistance. The term co-craft, as explored in this article, suggests a collaborative mode of crafts, where participants not only work together, but become reliant on each other. Following the ideas of craftsman and thinker William Coperthwaite, such tools for togetherness make democratic ideals tangible and are ‘socially valid designs’. This article examines a series of workshops where socially valid tools are designed and implemented in Gothenburg, to model possible modes of co-craft and democratic ways of practical cultivation of craft capabilities.","PeriodicalId":42324,"journal":{"name":"Craft Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craft Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00094_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the footsteps of specialization as well as studio crafts, making is commonly thought of as a solitary practice. The term do-it-yourself (DIY) emphasizes the singular and practical maker, empowered by his or her skills, taking action where deemed necessary. Along similar lines, tools are designed for the use by this lone maker, who seldom asks for assistance. The term co-craft, as explored in this article, suggests a collaborative mode of crafts, where participants not only work together, but become reliant on each other. Following the ideas of craftsman and thinker William Coperthwaite, such tools for togetherness make democratic ideals tangible and are ‘socially valid designs’. This article examines a series of workshops where socially valid tools are designed and implemented in Gothenburg, to model possible modes of co-craft and democratic ways of practical cultivation of craft capabilities.
社交有效工具:Sloydtrukk和共同打造的团结
在专业化和工作室工艺的脚步中,制作通常被认为是一种单独的实践。“自己动手”(DIY)这个词强调的是独特而实用的创造者,他们凭借自己的技能,在必要的时候采取行动。类似地,工具是为这个孤独的制造者设计的,他很少请求帮助。正如本文所探讨的那样,术语“共同工艺”暗示了一种工艺的协作模式,参与者不仅在一起工作,而且相互依赖。遵循工匠和思想家William cooperthwaite的想法,这种团结的工具使民主理想具体化,是“社会有效的设计”。本文考察了一系列在哥德堡设计和实施社会有效工具的研讨会,以模拟可能的共同工艺模式和工艺能力实际培养的民主方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信