Burundian Female Survivors of War (SOW): Views of Health Before, During, and Post Conflict

Jenelle R. Walker, J. Nizigiyimana, Oluwasola Banke-Thomas, Eric Niragira, Yvette Nijimbere, C. Johnson-Agbakwu
{"title":"Burundian Female Survivors of War (SOW): Views of Health Before, During, and Post Conflict","authors":"Jenelle R. Walker, J. Nizigiyimana, Oluwasola Banke-Thomas, Eric Niragira, Yvette Nijimbere, C. Johnson-Agbakwu","doi":"10.1108/S0275-495920180000036013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose \nTo determine the health status of women before, during, and after the war, and to explore women’s perceived health needs and current access to healthcare. \n \n \nMethodology/approach \nIndividual interviews and focus groups were conducted in urban and rural areas. A total of 52 women participated in the study (N = 52; Individual Interviews, n = 12; Focus Group Participants, n = 40). \n \n \nFindings \nWomen’s health concerns and healthcare needs overlap between the rural and urban communities. The women reported the needs for empowerment in the forms of social support groups for health, specialists for women’s health, education, resources, prevention, financial support to look for medical services, and mental health issues. \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \nSince these focus groups and interviews were conducted, the women have continued to meet. The strength of these meetings is represented in the forms of preparing a meal, eating, and socializing in unity. The social support experienced in these gatherings allows the women to openly express their issues, fears, concerns, joys, and successes. The CBPR approach is an important necessity when working with vulnerable populations. There were some inherent limitations due to economic issues to support the gatherings, transportation, and health-related complications that may have prevented women from attending. \n \n \nOriginality/value \nDisparate health outcomes and biologic–environmental interactions are represented in female survivors of war. Their issues began or were exacerbated during war and continue today. In the future, we seek to identify and establish a culturally and gender-specific intervention for health access, prevention, maintenance, and improvements.","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0275-495920180000036013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the sociology of health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920180000036013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To determine the health status of women before, during, and after the war, and to explore women’s perceived health needs and current access to healthcare. Methodology/approach Individual interviews and focus groups were conducted in urban and rural areas. A total of 52 women participated in the study (N = 52; Individual Interviews, n = 12; Focus Group Participants, n = 40). Findings Women’s health concerns and healthcare needs overlap between the rural and urban communities. The women reported the needs for empowerment in the forms of social support groups for health, specialists for women’s health, education, resources, prevention, financial support to look for medical services, and mental health issues. Research limitations/implications Since these focus groups and interviews were conducted, the women have continued to meet. The strength of these meetings is represented in the forms of preparing a meal, eating, and socializing in unity. The social support experienced in these gatherings allows the women to openly express their issues, fears, concerns, joys, and successes. The CBPR approach is an important necessity when working with vulnerable populations. There were some inherent limitations due to economic issues to support the gatherings, transportation, and health-related complications that may have prevented women from attending. Originality/value Disparate health outcomes and biologic–environmental interactions are represented in female survivors of war. Their issues began or were exacerbated during war and continue today. In the future, we seek to identify and establish a culturally and gender-specific intervention for health access, prevention, maintenance, and improvements.
布隆迪女性战争幸存者:冲突前、冲突中和冲突后的健康观
摘要目的确定战争前后妇女的健康状况,探讨妇女的健康需求和目前获得医疗保健的机会。方法/方法在城市和农村地区进行了个别访谈和重点小组讨论。共有52名女性参与了这项研究(N=52;个人访谈,N=12;焦点小组参与者,N=40)。调查结果农村和城市社区妇女的健康问题和医疗保健需求重叠。妇女们报告说,需要以健康社会支持团体、妇女健康专家、教育、资源、预防、寻求医疗服务的财政支持和心理健康问题等形式增强权能。研究的局限性/影响自从进行了这些重点小组和访谈以来,妇女们继续会面。这些会议的力量体现在准备一顿饭、吃饭和团结社交的形式上。在这些聚会中获得的社会支持使女性能够公开表达她们的问题、恐惧、担忧、喜悦和成功。在与弱势群体合作时,CBPR方法是一种重要的必要性。由于经济问题,支持集会、交通和与健康相关的并发症可能会阻碍女性参加,因此存在一些固有的局限性。原创性/价值战争女性幸存者的健康结果和生物-环境相互作用存在差异。他们的问题在战争期间开始或加剧,并一直持续到今天。未来,我们将寻求确定并建立一种针对文化和性别的干预措施,用于获得、预防、维护和改善健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信