Competence Assessment and Structured Educational Remediation: Long-Term Impact on the Quality of Care Provided by Disciplined Physicians

Elizabeth J. Korinek, Alisa R. Johnson, Sindy Michelle Paul, E. S. Grace, William T. O’Neill, Meredith I. Borine
{"title":"Competence Assessment and Structured Educational Remediation: Long-Term Impact on the Quality of Care Provided by Disciplined Physicians","authors":"Elizabeth J. Korinek, Alisa R. Johnson, Sindy Michelle Paul, E. S. Grace, William T. O’Neill, Meredith I. Borine","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-108.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Medical licensing boards use competence assessment and educational intervention programs as tools in disciplinary actions. Few studies measure the impact of these remedial interventions on the quality of care provided by participants after such interventions. CPEP, the Center for Personalized Education for Professionals, provides clinical competence assessment/educational intervention services and practice monitoring, primarily for physicians complying with board orders due to substandard care. Depending on the board requirements, some physicians complete an assessment/educational intervention and, after completion, subsequently undergo practice monitoring (Intervention Group). Others participate in the practice monitoring without first completing an assessment/educational intervention (Non-Intervention Group). CPEP conducted a retrospective study of chart reviews (n=2073) performed as part of each group’s participation in the Practice Monitoring Program. When compared to the charts from the Intervention Group, charts from the Non-Intervention Group were more than five times more likely to demonstrate care below standard (P < 0.0001) and almost four times more likely to have documentation issues that prohibited the monitor’s ability to determine the quality of care (P < 0.0001). This study suggests that completion of a competence assessment/education intervention program is an effective means of achieving acceptable quality of care that is sustained over time (average 18 months) after completion of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-108.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical licensing boards use competence assessment and educational intervention programs as tools in disciplinary actions. Few studies measure the impact of these remedial interventions on the quality of care provided by participants after such interventions. CPEP, the Center for Personalized Education for Professionals, provides clinical competence assessment/educational intervention services and practice monitoring, primarily for physicians complying with board orders due to substandard care. Depending on the board requirements, some physicians complete an assessment/educational intervention and, after completion, subsequently undergo practice monitoring (Intervention Group). Others participate in the practice monitoring without first completing an assessment/educational intervention (Non-Intervention Group). CPEP conducted a retrospective study of chart reviews (n=2073) performed as part of each group’s participation in the Practice Monitoring Program. When compared to the charts from the Intervention Group, charts from the Non-Intervention Group were more than five times more likely to demonstrate care below standard (P < 0.0001) and almost four times more likely to have documentation issues that prohibited the monitor’s ability to determine the quality of care (P < 0.0001). This study suggests that completion of a competence assessment/education intervention program is an effective means of achieving acceptable quality of care that is sustained over time (average 18 months) after completion of the intervention.
能力评估和结构化教育补救:对专业医生提供的护理质量的长期影响
医疗许可委员会使用能力评估和教育干预计划作为纪律处分的工具。很少有研究衡量这些补救干预措施对参与者在此类干预措施后提供的护理质量的影响。CPEP是专业人员个性化教育中心,主要为因护理不合格而遵守董事会命令的医生提供临床能力评估/教育干预服务和实践监测。根据委员会的要求,一些医生完成评估/教育干预,完成后,随后接受实践监测(干预组)。其他人在未首先完成评估/教育干预的情况下参与实践监测(非干预组)。CPEP对图表评审(n=2073)进行了回顾性研究,这些评审是每组参与实践监测计划的一部分。当与来自干预组的图表进行比较时,非干预组的图表显示护理低于标准的可能性是对照组的五倍多(P<0.0001),出现文件问题阻碍监测人员确定护理质量的可能性几乎是对照组(P<0.001)的四倍。这项研究表明,完成能力评估/教育干预计划是在干预完成后的一段时间(平均18个月)内达到可接受的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书