Sensory Interaction Balance and Limits of Stability in Neck Pain: Comparison of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Patients

IF 0.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M. Tomruk, M. Soysal Tomruk, O. Kalemci
{"title":"Sensory Interaction Balance and Limits of Stability in Neck Pain: Comparison of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Patients","authors":"M. Tomruk, M. Soysal Tomruk, O. Kalemci","doi":"10.30621/jbachs.1172228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: A variety of sensory-motor changes are reported in both the traumatic and non-traumatic neck pain. However, it is still unclear whether there is a significant difference between individuals with traumatic neck pain and those with non-traumatic in terms of postural control. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether there was a difference between individuals with traumatic pain and non-traumatic neck pain in terms of postural control and disability. \nMethods: Ninety-two patients with chronic neck pain were grouped according to the onset of pain. Clinical test of sensory interaction balance (CTSIB) and limits of stability (LOS) test were used for postural control assessment. The Numeric Rating Scale and Neck Pain Disability Index (NPDI) were used to measure pain intensity and disability, respectively. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. \nResults: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LOS, CTSIB and NPDI scores (p > 0.05). \nConclusion: The results of this study suggest that postural control and disability do not differ between patients with traumatic and non-traumatic neck pain. Therefore, from a clinical perspective, postural control and disability should be evaluated without considering trauma history in patients with neck pain.","PeriodicalId":40972,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1172228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: A variety of sensory-motor changes are reported in both the traumatic and non-traumatic neck pain. However, it is still unclear whether there is a significant difference between individuals with traumatic neck pain and those with non-traumatic in terms of postural control. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether there was a difference between individuals with traumatic pain and non-traumatic neck pain in terms of postural control and disability. Methods: Ninety-two patients with chronic neck pain were grouped according to the onset of pain. Clinical test of sensory interaction balance (CTSIB) and limits of stability (LOS) test were used for postural control assessment. The Numeric Rating Scale and Neck Pain Disability Index (NPDI) were used to measure pain intensity and disability, respectively. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LOS, CTSIB and NPDI scores (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that postural control and disability do not differ between patients with traumatic and non-traumatic neck pain. Therefore, from a clinical perspective, postural control and disability should be evaluated without considering trauma history in patients with neck pain.
颈部疼痛的感觉相互作用平衡和稳定性极限:创伤和非创伤患者的比较
背景和目的:在外伤性和非外伤性颈部疼痛中都有各种感觉运动改变的报道。然而,目前尚不清楚创伤性颈部疼痛患者和非创伤性颈部疼痛者在姿势控制方面是否存在显著差异。这项横断面研究的目的是调查创伤性疼痛和非创伤性颈部疼痛患者在姿势控制和残疾方面是否存在差异。方法:将92例慢性颈部疼痛患者按疼痛程度分组。感觉相互作用平衡(CTSIB)临床试验和稳定性极限(LOS)试验用于姿势控制评估。数值评定量表和颈部疼痛残疾指数(NPDI)分别用于测量疼痛强度和残疾。Mann-Whitney U检验用于比较各组。结果:LOS、CTSIB和NPDI评分在各组之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,创伤性和非创伤性颈部疼痛患者的姿势控制和残疾没有差异。因此,从临床角度来看,应在不考虑颈部疼痛患者创伤史的情况下评估姿势控制和残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信