{"title":"\"A Terrible Art of Sharp-Shooting at the Audience\": Teaching the Shock of Modernist Drama via the Play of Ideas","authors":"Christopher Grobe","doi":"10.3138/md-66-2-1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:One of the hardest things to convey to present-day readers of modernist drama is the power it had to shock turn-of-the-century audiences. Defining shock as a \"structure of feeling\" (Raymond Williams) that was pursued in especially teachable ways by the modernist \"play of ideas,\" this essay shares a set of pedagogical strategies for helping students to feel this shock while also reflecting on the political implications of an art committed to shock. Among these teaching strategies are two attempts to set this \"terrible art\" (G. B. Shaw) in new, revealing contexts: (1) comparing the modernist theater to non-theatrical practices that attach ideas to structures of feeling besides shock, and (2) pairing modernist plays that \"shock\" their audience in pursuit of a feminist politics with contemporary plays that \"destroy the audience\" (Young Jean Lee) in pursuit of an anti-racist politics. The result is not to lionize shock as a universal ideal, but to explore it as a tactic—useful in some settings, harmful in others; always distributing its benefits and its costs unevenly.","PeriodicalId":43301,"journal":{"name":"MODERN DRAMA","volume":"66 1","pages":"158 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/md-66-2-1279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
abstract:One of the hardest things to convey to present-day readers of modernist drama is the power it had to shock turn-of-the-century audiences. Defining shock as a "structure of feeling" (Raymond Williams) that was pursued in especially teachable ways by the modernist "play of ideas," this essay shares a set of pedagogical strategies for helping students to feel this shock while also reflecting on the political implications of an art committed to shock. Among these teaching strategies are two attempts to set this "terrible art" (G. B. Shaw) in new, revealing contexts: (1) comparing the modernist theater to non-theatrical practices that attach ideas to structures of feeling besides shock, and (2) pairing modernist plays that "shock" their audience in pursuit of a feminist politics with contemporary plays that "destroy the audience" (Young Jean Lee) in pursuit of an anti-racist politics. The result is not to lionize shock as a universal ideal, but to explore it as a tactic—useful in some settings, harmful in others; always distributing its benefits and its costs unevenly.
现代主义戏剧最难向当代读者传达的一点是它震撼世纪之交观众的力量。将冲击定义为一种“感觉结构”(Raymond Williams),现代主义“思想的游戏”以特别可教的方式追求这种结构,本文分享了一套教学策略,帮助学生感受这种冲击,同时也反映了一种致力于冲击的艺术的政治含义。在这些教学策略中,有两种尝试将这种“可怕的艺术”(G. B. Shaw)置于新的、揭示性的语境中:(1)将现代主义戏剧与非戏剧实践进行比较,这些实践将思想附加到除了震撼之外的情感结构上;(2)将追求女权主义政治的“震撼”观众的现代主义戏剧与追求反种族主义政治的“摧毁观众”的当代戏剧(Young Jean Lee)配对。其结果不是把休克奉为一种普遍的理想,而是把它作为一种策略来探索——在某些情况下有用,在另一些情况下有害;总是不均衡地分配收益和成本。