R. Braimoh, T. I. Ediale, M. Mabayoje, O. Ale, B. Bello, C. Amira
{"title":"Comparison of CKD-EPI, C-G and MDRD equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease population in South-Western Nigeria","authors":"R. Braimoh, T. I. Ediale, M. Mabayoje, O. Ale, B. Bello, C. Amira","doi":"10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ethnic variabilities make reliability of formula equations for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) doubtful in many populations. We compared Cockroft-Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), and chronic kidney diseases epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in adult Nigerian CKD subjects. \nMethodology: We measured 24-hour-urinary creatinine clearance of 311 adult CKD patients and compared with the three estimated equations. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between estimated equations and measured creatinine clearance (mGFR). Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic power of the equations. Equation with accuracy within 30% of mGFR of ≥90% was considered acceptable for use. \nResults: Mean age was 41.9±12.7 years with 182(58.5%) females. The mean GFR using CKD-EPI, 2 MDRD and CG equations were 69.5±33.9, 65.9±33.0 and 66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m respectively 2 (mGFR 68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m ). The 3 equations showed positive correlation to mGFR (r=0.95) but CKD-EPI had the least bias. \nConclusion: All three equations can be used but CKD-EPI equation is preferable in Nigerian CKD patients, especially with GFR> 60mls/min. ","PeriodicalId":29646,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ethnic variabilities make reliability of formula equations for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) doubtful in many populations. We compared Cockroft-Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), and chronic kidney diseases epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in adult Nigerian CKD subjects.
Methodology: We measured 24-hour-urinary creatinine clearance of 311 adult CKD patients and compared with the three estimated equations. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between estimated equations and measured creatinine clearance (mGFR). Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic power of the equations. Equation with accuracy within 30% of mGFR of ≥90% was considered acceptable for use.
Results: Mean age was 41.9±12.7 years with 182(58.5%) females. The mean GFR using CKD-EPI, 2 MDRD and CG equations were 69.5±33.9, 65.9±33.0 and 66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m respectively 2 (mGFR 68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m ). The 3 equations showed positive correlation to mGFR (r=0.95) but CKD-EPI had the least bias.
Conclusion: All three equations can be used but CKD-EPI equation is preferable in Nigerian CKD patients, especially with GFR> 60mls/min.