Some reflections on Levinas and ethics: Response to Alvi

IF 1.1 2区社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Anthropological Theory Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1463499619890426

K. O’Neill

引用次数: 1

Abstract

A growing number of essays authored by anthropologists invoke the work of Emmanuel Levinas. The rise of this quiet tide deserves some reflection, not only because anthropological references to Levinas keep coming but also because very few of these efforts ever end up in discipline-specific journals. They tend to get pushed toward philosophical and theological venues. Why is this?

查看原文本刊更多论文

列维纳斯与伦理学的思考——对阿尔维的回应

越来越多的人类学家撰写的文章引用了埃马纽埃尔·莱维纳斯的作品。这股平静的浪潮的兴起值得反思，不仅因为人类学界对莱文的引用不断出现，还因为这些努力很少出现在特定学科的期刊上。他们倾向于被推向哲学和神学领域。为什么会这样？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Anthropological Theory ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anthropological Theory is an international peer reviewed journal seeking to strengthen anthropological theorizing in different areas of the world. This is an exciting forum for new insights into theoretical issues in anthropology and more broadly, social theory. Anthropological Theory publishes articles engaging with a variety of theoretical debates in areas including: * marxism * feminism * political philosophy * historical sociology * hermeneutics * critical theory * philosophy of science * biological anthropology * archaeology