{"title":"Long-term effects of peer and teacher feedback on L2 pronunciation","authors":"Ines A. Martin, Lieselotte Sippel","doi":"10.1075/jslp.22041.mar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigated the long-term effects of peer and teacher feedback on pronunciation development.\n Participants included 94 learners of German. They were assigned to a teacher feedback group (TeacherF Group), a peer feedback\n provider group (PeerF Providers), a peer feedback receiver group (PeerF Receivers), or a control group. After completing general\n pronunciation training on a segmental and a suprasegmental feature in German, the TeacherF Group received feedback on their\n pronunciation from a teacher, the PeerF Providers gave feedback to peers, and the PeerF Receivers received feedback from peers.\n The control group did not complete pronunciation training or receive feedback. Results from native speaker comprehensibility\n ratings of learners’ productions indicated that while the TeacherF Group and the PeerF Receivers improved in the short term, only\n the PeerF Providers maintained their gains in pronunciation development over time. Methodological and pedagogical implications of\n these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of second language pronunciation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22041.mar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study investigated the long-term effects of peer and teacher feedback on pronunciation development.
Participants included 94 learners of German. They were assigned to a teacher feedback group (TeacherF Group), a peer feedback
provider group (PeerF Providers), a peer feedback receiver group (PeerF Receivers), or a control group. After completing general
pronunciation training on a segmental and a suprasegmental feature in German, the TeacherF Group received feedback on their
pronunciation from a teacher, the PeerF Providers gave feedback to peers, and the PeerF Receivers received feedback from peers.
The control group did not complete pronunciation training or receive feedback. Results from native speaker comprehensibility
ratings of learners’ productions indicated that while the TeacherF Group and the PeerF Receivers improved in the short term, only
the PeerF Providers maintained their gains in pronunciation development over time. Methodological and pedagogical implications of
these findings are discussed.