Selective Historical Precedents in Appropriation as Cover Version

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Takasaka
{"title":"Selective Historical Precedents in Appropriation as Cover Version","authors":"M. Takasaka","doi":"10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article focuses on selective historical precedents in appropriation as cover version that highlight how difference is produced through repetition in the visual arts. The article focuses on three historical periods. The first examples emanate from the 1930s: Marcel Duchamp’s Boîte-en-valise and Kurt Schwitters’s Merzbau. The second period is the 1980s and looks at appropriation in North American art. I draw on the writings of Douglas Crimp, who contrasts the appropriation of style to the appropriation of material, and the writings of John C. Welchman, who contrasts the work of Sherrie Levine and Richard Prince from the 1980s to that of Mike Kelley from the 1990s. Third, I consider the interpretation of appropriation in Australian art in the 1980s and 1990s, drawing on the writings of Rex Butler. This article provides a context for considering appropriation as cover version, in general and specifically in relation to visual arts practice.","PeriodicalId":40211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","volume":"3 1","pages":"285 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASIAPACIPOPCULT.3.2.0285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article focuses on selective historical precedents in appropriation as cover version that highlight how difference is produced through repetition in the visual arts. The article focuses on three historical periods. The first examples emanate from the 1930s: Marcel Duchamp’s Boîte-en-valise and Kurt Schwitters’s Merzbau. The second period is the 1980s and looks at appropriation in North American art. I draw on the writings of Douglas Crimp, who contrasts the appropriation of style to the appropriation of material, and the writings of John C. Welchman, who contrasts the work of Sherrie Levine and Richard Prince from the 1980s to that of Mike Kelley from the 1990s. Third, I consider the interpretation of appropriation in Australian art in the 1980s and 1990s, drawing on the writings of Rex Butler. This article provides a context for considering appropriation as cover version, in general and specifically in relation to visual arts practice.
《拨款的历史先例选择》为封面
摘要:这篇文章的重点是选择性的挪用历史先例作为封面版本,强调差异是如何通过视觉艺术中的重复产生的。这篇文章聚焦于三个历史时期。第一个例子来自20世纪30年代:马塞尔·杜尚(Marcel Duchamp)的《Bo-恩瓦利斯》(Boîte-en-valise)和库尔特·施维特斯(Kurt Schwitters)的《默茨堡》(Merzbau)。第二个时期是20世纪80年代,研究北美艺术中的挪用。我借鉴了道格拉斯·克里普的作品,他将风格的挪用与材料的挪用进行了对比,以及约翰·C·韦尔奇曼的作品,后者将雪莉·莱文和理查德·普林斯20世纪80年的作品与迈克·凯利20世纪90年代的作品进行了对比。第三,我借鉴了雷克斯·巴特勒的著作,思考了20世纪80年代和90年代澳大利亚艺术中对挪用的解释。这篇文章提供了一个背景,考虑挪用作为封面版本,一般和具体的视觉艺术实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信