{"title":"The Violence of Being. The Holocaust in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas","authors":"D. Pollefeyt","doi":"10.15388/problemos.priedas.22.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution shows how the Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas has been confronted autobiographically with National-Socialism (1933-1945) and how his personal experience and the experience of the Jewish people under Hitlerism were translated in his philosophical understanding of ‘being’ as ‘il y a’ (in English: ‘there is’). The Holocaust provides a unique negative point of entry to understand Levinas’ ontological category which is as such not understandable since in the il y a, there is no longer a subject that stands before the objectivity of reality. On the contrary, the il y a is exactly the category that expresses a situation where the subject itself has no longer the ‘right’ to exist as such but still does not stop to exist. This violence of being is exactly what Hitlerism wanted to do in creating the Holocaust and submitting the Jewish people to it. This makes understandable how the whole philosophy of Levinas is an effort to overcome the il y a through a moral answer to the Holocaust.","PeriodicalId":41448,"journal":{"name":"Problemos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/problemos.priedas.22.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This contribution shows how the Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas has been confronted autobiographically with National-Socialism (1933-1945) and how his personal experience and the experience of the Jewish people under Hitlerism were translated in his philosophical understanding of ‘being’ as ‘il y a’ (in English: ‘there is’). The Holocaust provides a unique negative point of entry to understand Levinas’ ontological category which is as such not understandable since in the il y a, there is no longer a subject that stands before the objectivity of reality. On the contrary, the il y a is exactly the category that expresses a situation where the subject itself has no longer the ‘right’ to exist as such but still does not stop to exist. This violence of being is exactly what Hitlerism wanted to do in creating the Holocaust and submitting the Jewish people to it. This makes understandable how the whole philosophy of Levinas is an effort to overcome the il y a through a moral answer to the Holocaust.
这篇文章展示了犹太哲学家埃马纽埃尔·莱维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)如何自传体地面对国家社会主义(1933-1945),以及他的个人经历和希特勒主义下犹太人的经历如何在他对“存在”的哲学理解中被翻译为“存在”(英语:there is)。大屠杀为理解莱维纳斯的本体论范畴提供了一个独特的负面切入点,这是不可理解的,因为在过去,不再有一个主体站在现实的客观性之前。相反,il y a正是表达一种情况的类别,在这种情况下,主体本身不再有这样的“权利”存在,但仍然没有停止存在。这种存在的暴力正是希特勒主义在创造大屠杀并让犹太人民服从大屠杀时想要做的。这就可以理解莱维纳斯的整个哲学是如何通过对大屠杀的道德回答来克服恐惧的。