Group Versus Individual Rehabilitation in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Noninferiority Assessment

R. Byrd, Rachel Breslin, Peijin Wang, Sarah Peskoe, Shein-Chung Chow, Sean Lowers, Laurie D. Snyder, A. Pastva
{"title":"Group Versus Individual Rehabilitation in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Noninferiority Assessment","authors":"R. Byrd, Rachel Breslin, Peijin Wang, Sarah Peskoe, Shein-Chung Chow, Sean Lowers, Laurie D. Snyder, A. Pastva","doi":"10.1097/cpt.0000000000000233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Pulmonary rehabilitation both before and after lung transplant is associated with improved functional exercise capacity and physical quality of life. There is wide variation in rehabilitation program provision. This study's aim was to compare the effects of group versus individual rehabilitation.\n \n \n \n Individuals who completed pre- and/or posttransplant outpatient rehabilitation at a single, academic, medical center between March 2019 and March 2021 were included in this study. Noninferiority analysis was used to assess differences in change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) between group and individual rehabilitation. Multivariable linear regression models examined 6MWD, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index Pulmonary Version (QLI), Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CESD), and San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ).\n \n \n \n Preoperatively, 93 patients completed group and 81 completed individual rehabilitation. Postoperatively, 110 completed group and 105 completed individual rehabilitation. Individual rehabilitation was noninferior to group rehabilitation (α = 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in changes in 6MWD, SPPB, QLI, CESD, or SOBQ, between cohorts pre- and postoperatively (all P > .25).\n \n \n \n Individual rehabilitation seems to be an acceptable alternative to group rehabilitation for lung transplant candidates and recipients.\n","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpt.0000000000000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation both before and after lung transplant is associated with improved functional exercise capacity and physical quality of life. There is wide variation in rehabilitation program provision. This study's aim was to compare the effects of group versus individual rehabilitation. Individuals who completed pre- and/or posttransplant outpatient rehabilitation at a single, academic, medical center between March 2019 and March 2021 were included in this study. Noninferiority analysis was used to assess differences in change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) between group and individual rehabilitation. Multivariable linear regression models examined 6MWD, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index Pulmonary Version (QLI), Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CESD), and San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ). Preoperatively, 93 patients completed group and 81 completed individual rehabilitation. Postoperatively, 110 completed group and 105 completed individual rehabilitation. Individual rehabilitation was noninferior to group rehabilitation (α = 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in changes in 6MWD, SPPB, QLI, CESD, or SOBQ, between cohorts pre- and postoperatively (all P > .25). Individual rehabilitation seems to be an acceptable alternative to group rehabilitation for lung transplant candidates and recipients.
肺移植组与个体康复:回顾性非劣效性评价
肺移植前后的肺康复与功能运动能力和身体生活质量的改善有关。康复计划的规定有很大的差异。这项研究的目的是比较团体康复和个人康复的效果。2019年3月至2021年3月期间在单一学术医疗中心完成移植前和/或移植后门诊康复的个体被纳入本研究。采用非劣效性分析评估组间和个体间6分钟步行距离(6MWD)变化的差异。多变量线性回归模型检验了6MWD、短体力表现电池(SPPB)、ferans and Powers生活质量指数肺版(QLI)、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CESD)和圣地亚哥呼吸急促问卷(SOBQ)。术前93例患者完成群体康复,81例患者完成个体康复。术后组康复110例,个体康复105例。个体康复效果不低于组康复效果(α = 0.05)。此外,患者术前和术后6MWD、SPPB、QLI、CESD或SOBQ的变化无显著差异(P均为0.25)。对于肺移植候选人和受者而言,个体康复似乎是一种可接受的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信