Pedagogy and Social Critique in the Era of Fragmentation: A Collective Writing Experiment as cadavres exquis

Q3 Social Sciences
Veronica Garcia Lazo, K. Locke, Nicolás Rupcich, Gabby O’Connor, Caroline Yoon, Alys Longley
{"title":"Pedagogy and Social Critique in the Era of Fragmentation: A Collective Writing Experiment as cadavres exquis","authors":"Veronica Garcia Lazo, K. Locke, Nicolás Rupcich, Gabby O’Connor, Caroline Yoon, Alys Longley","doi":"10.1163/23644583-bja10008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis is the result of a collaborative and creative experiment, a process in which six scholars—Garcia Lazo, Locke, Rupcich, O’Connor, Yoon and Longley—agreed to co-author an article through written and/or visual pieces of work. The emphasis taken in the article is to perform a methodology of fragmentation. The article is to be read as a series of ‘folds’, where collages or fragments of text are contained and while each fold is numbered, the reader is invited to read any fold in any order. Using fragmentation as method in writing also inspired our interpretation of a body of work made up of multiple ‘folds’ from the collaborative parlour game played by the surrealist movement. Known as cadavre exquis, surrealists enjoyed the strange juxtaposition created by each artist’s contribution as they drew part of a body onto a folded piece of paper without seeing the previous drawings in each fold. While often referred to in the context of psychoanalysis, we instead emphasise the fragmentation and hybridity of this form of collaboration in order to critique of universalising narratives about education (and writing) that we consider to be at odds with the post-capitalist realities of contemporary education and life.","PeriodicalId":31797,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23644583-bja10008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This is the result of a collaborative and creative experiment, a process in which six scholars—Garcia Lazo, Locke, Rupcich, O’Connor, Yoon and Longley—agreed to co-author an article through written and/or visual pieces of work. The emphasis taken in the article is to perform a methodology of fragmentation. The article is to be read as a series of ‘folds’, where collages or fragments of text are contained and while each fold is numbered, the reader is invited to read any fold in any order. Using fragmentation as method in writing also inspired our interpretation of a body of work made up of multiple ‘folds’ from the collaborative parlour game played by the surrealist movement. Known as cadavre exquis, surrealists enjoyed the strange juxtaposition created by each artist’s contribution as they drew part of a body onto a folded piece of paper without seeing the previous drawings in each fold. While often referred to in the context of psychoanalysis, we instead emphasise the fragmentation and hybridity of this form of collaboration in order to critique of universalising narratives about education (and writing) that we consider to be at odds with the post-capitalist realities of contemporary education and life.
碎片化时代的教育学与社会批判:作为地籍簿的集体写作实验
这是一个合作和创造性实验的结果,在这个过程中,六位学者——Garcia Lazo、Locke、Rupcich、O’Connor、Yoon和Longley——同意通过书面和/或视觉作品共同撰写一篇文章。这篇文章的重点是执行一种碎片化的方法。文章将被阅读为一系列的“折叠”,其中包含拼贴画或文本片段,当每个折叠都有编号时,读者可以按任何顺序阅读任何折叠。在写作中使用碎片化的方法也启发了我们对超现实主义运动所玩的合作客厅游戏中由多个“折叠”组成的作品的解读。被称为cadavre exquis的超现实主义者喜欢每个艺术家的贡献所创造的奇怪的并置,因为他们在折叠的纸上画出了身体的一部分,而没有看到每个折叠中以前的画。虽然在精神分析的背景下经常被提及,但我们反而强调了这种合作形式的碎片化和混合性,以批评关于教育(和写作)的普遍化叙事,我们认为这些叙事与当代教育和生活的后资本主义现实不符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书