Actual rate of the management fee in mutual funds of different styles

Equilibrium Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.24136/eq.2022.033
Katarzyna Perez, Łukasz Szymczyk
{"title":"Actual rate of the management fee in mutual funds of different styles","authors":"Katarzyna Perez, Łukasz Szymczyk","doi":"10.24136/eq.2022.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: Exponential growth of passive mutual funds after 2007?2008 global financial crisis put pressure on active fund managers to lower the management fees. The real costs of active fund management are, however, very often higher than the values of management fees reported publicly. Thus it is not easy to decide on the quality of the fund management and estimate the level of management charges optimal for the future fund performance.\nPurpose of the article:  In this study, we propose to utilize an actual rate of the management fee (ARMF) disclosed in the management company financial statements as a measure of the real value of the management costs and investigate its determinants in mutual funds of different styles.\nMethods: Using a dataset of 21,618 monthly observations for 500 mutual funds from a market of diversified structure and high management fees charged we test the operating model of a mutual fund performance, and derive the formula of a before-fee return with the ARMF as its component. The fund performance is measured by a raw before-fee return and two types of risk-adjusted alphas based on the multifactor model of Carhart (1997) and the fund attributes. Later, using panel data we explain ARMF by mutual fund performance and attributes. We also compare the results to the ones obtained for the total operational cost (TOC) ? a value similar to ARMF that is disclosed in mutual fund financial reports.\nFindings & value added: We find that the proposed ARMF is related more to the size and not to the performance, age or a cash flow of mutual funds. We observe it among all studied fund styles. The largest deviations of the average ARMF are seen in the management companies that belong to the banks? capital groups. The proposed measure of the management fee included in the operating model of a mutual fund performance can be used for any local mutual fund worldwide, and compared with other fund markets of more or less diversified style structures.","PeriodicalId":84667,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research background: Exponential growth of passive mutual funds after 2007?2008 global financial crisis put pressure on active fund managers to lower the management fees. The real costs of active fund management are, however, very often higher than the values of management fees reported publicly. Thus it is not easy to decide on the quality of the fund management and estimate the level of management charges optimal for the future fund performance. Purpose of the article:  In this study, we propose to utilize an actual rate of the management fee (ARMF) disclosed in the management company financial statements as a measure of the real value of the management costs and investigate its determinants in mutual funds of different styles. Methods: Using a dataset of 21,618 monthly observations for 500 mutual funds from a market of diversified structure and high management fees charged we test the operating model of a mutual fund performance, and derive the formula of a before-fee return with the ARMF as its component. The fund performance is measured by a raw before-fee return and two types of risk-adjusted alphas based on the multifactor model of Carhart (1997) and the fund attributes. Later, using panel data we explain ARMF by mutual fund performance and attributes. We also compare the results to the ones obtained for the total operational cost (TOC) ? a value similar to ARMF that is disclosed in mutual fund financial reports. Findings & value added: We find that the proposed ARMF is related more to the size and not to the performance, age or a cash flow of mutual funds. We observe it among all studied fund styles. The largest deviations of the average ARMF are seen in the management companies that belong to the banks? capital groups. The proposed measure of the management fee included in the operating model of a mutual fund performance can be used for any local mutual fund worldwide, and compared with other fund markets of more or less diversified style structures.
不同类型共同基金的实际管理费比率
研究背景:2007年后被动型共同基金指数增长?2008年全球金融危机给主动型基金管理公司带来了降低管理费的压力。然而,主动基金管理的实际成本往往高于公开公布的管理费价值。因此,很难确定基金管理的质量,并估计对未来基金业绩最优的管理费水平。本文的目的:在本研究中,我们建议利用管理公司财务报表中披露的实际管理费(ARMF)比率作为管理成本实际价值的衡量标准,并研究其在不同风格的共同基金中的决定因素。方法:利用500只共同基金的21,618个月观察数据集,从一个多元化结构和收取高额管理费的市场中检验共同基金业绩的运营模型,并推导出以ARMF为组成部分的收费前回报公式。基金绩效是通过收费前的原始收益和基于Carhart(1997)的多因素模型和基金属性的两种风险调整阿尔法来衡量的。然后,利用面板数据,我们用共同基金的业绩和属性来解释ARMF。我们还将结果与总运营成本(TOC)的结果进行比较。类似于共同基金财务报告中披露的ARMF值。研究结果和附加价值:我们发现拟议的ARMF与共同基金的规模有关,而与业绩、年龄或现金流量无关。我们在所有被研究的基金风格中都观察到了这一点。在银行的管理公司中,平均ARMF的偏差最大。资本集团。包括在共同基金业绩运作模式内的拟议管理费衡量标准,可用于全球任何本地共同基金,并可与其他风格结构或多或少多样化的基金市场进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信