Why do we need a sociocognitive-CDA in hate speech studies? A corpus-based systematic review

IF 2.4 1区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Discourse & Society Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:10.1177/09579265221126599

Ahmad Sirulhaq, U. Yuwono, A. Muta’ali

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a systematic review of previous research on hate speech in discourse studies indexed in the Scopus database in the last five years, from 2015 to 2021. This review aims to map the main topics and methods used in hate speech studies and then provide critical remarks related to the methodological issues. The review focused on 70 selected articles and was analyzed using the NVivo 12 combined with the LancsBox 6.0. Based on the analysis, previous studies show a strong relationship between hate speech, political issues, and discrimination. Although many studies of hate speech have applied the CDA approach, and some of them have used sociocognitive CDA, it is surprising and unfortunate that previous researchers did not show much attention and further exploration of the cognitive aspects of the theory itself. It means that the cognitive aspects of hate speech have yet to be appropriately explored.

查看原文本刊更多论文

为什么我们在仇恨言论研究中需要一个社会认知CDA？基于语料库的系统综述

本文系统回顾了过去五年（从2015年到2021年）Scopus数据库中索引的话语研究中对仇恨言论的研究。这篇综述旨在绘制仇恨言论研究中使用的主要主题和方法，然后提供与方法论问题相关的批评性意见。综述集中在70篇精选文章上，并使用NVivo 12和LancsBox 6.0进行分析。根据分析，先前的研究表明，仇恨言论、政治问题和歧视之间存在着密切的关系。尽管许多关于仇恨言论的研究都应用了CDA方法，其中一些研究使用了社会认知CDA，但令人惊讶和遗憾的是，以前的研究人员没有对该理论本身的认知方面给予太多关注和进一步探索。这意味着仇恨言论的认知方面还有待适当探索。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Discourse & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Discourse & Society is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal whose major aim is to publish outstanding research at the boundaries of discourse analysis and the social sciences. It focuses on explicit theory formation and analysis of the relationships between the structures of text, talk, language use, verbal interaction or communication, on the one hand, and societal, political or cultural micro- and macrostructures and cognitive social representations, on the other hand. That is, D&S studies society through discourse and discourse through an analysis of its socio-political and cultural functions or implications. Its contributions are based on advanced theory formation and methodologies of several disciplines in the humanities and social sciences.