Live well after stroke

K. Connolly, S. P. Teeling, M. McNamara
{"title":"Live well after stroke","authors":"K. Connolly, S. P. Teeling, M. McNamara","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.102.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Difficulties in meeting guidelines on the intensity of therapy for acute stroke patients is common internationally. Current UK guidelines recommend patients receive a daily minimum of 45 minutes of each required therapy. This article details practice development work in an acute stroke unit in a large teaching hospital in Ireland, where an audit of stroke patients discharged in one month found that only 27% had received what is deemed ‘sufficient’ physiotherapy, while 30% had physiotherapy on fewer than half of their days of admission. Aim: Based on the audit, we looked at how we could increase therapy intensity for patients and correspondingly improve the quality of their experience of care and that of their therapists. We broadened our scope beyond physiotherapy to include occupational and speech and language therapies. We aimed to increase patient treatment time from an average baseline of eight to 16 minutes per day to 45 minutes per day. Methods: We used a combination of Lean Six Sigma and person-centred improvement principles, in conjunction with appreciative inquiry to redesign the current approach to therapy time. Results: Following our work, patient therapy time increased cumulatively by 125% across all therapies on days when no group classes were held and by 164% on days with classes. The average time patients spent with no therapy interaction outside therapy hours fell from 5.34 hours to 2.3 hours. Conclusions: The combination of approaches brought under the banner of the ‘Live Well After Stroke’ initiative ensured the project catalysed a new and more sustainable way of working together. The use of appreciative inquiry in our practice development workshops worked well as a way of respecting people’s sense of purpose and their values, and working with these to articulate, and progress towards, a desired shared future state. Implications for practice: Our use of the improvement sciences of Lean Six Sigma and person-centredness combined with appreciative inquiry demonstrates the synergistic elements of these sciences that can be optimised for use in practice development Without a change in resources, ways of providing therapy for this population can be redesigned to increase intensity Addressing culture as a key component of a practice development project resulted in an improvement in team collaboration and communication","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.102.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Difficulties in meeting guidelines on the intensity of therapy for acute stroke patients is common internationally. Current UK guidelines recommend patients receive a daily minimum of 45 minutes of each required therapy. This article details practice development work in an acute stroke unit in a large teaching hospital in Ireland, where an audit of stroke patients discharged in one month found that only 27% had received what is deemed ‘sufficient’ physiotherapy, while 30% had physiotherapy on fewer than half of their days of admission. Aim: Based on the audit, we looked at how we could increase therapy intensity for patients and correspondingly improve the quality of their experience of care and that of their therapists. We broadened our scope beyond physiotherapy to include occupational and speech and language therapies. We aimed to increase patient treatment time from an average baseline of eight to 16 minutes per day to 45 minutes per day. Methods: We used a combination of Lean Six Sigma and person-centred improvement principles, in conjunction with appreciative inquiry to redesign the current approach to therapy time. Results: Following our work, patient therapy time increased cumulatively by 125% across all therapies on days when no group classes were held and by 164% on days with classes. The average time patients spent with no therapy interaction outside therapy hours fell from 5.34 hours to 2.3 hours. Conclusions: The combination of approaches brought under the banner of the ‘Live Well After Stroke’ initiative ensured the project catalysed a new and more sustainable way of working together. The use of appreciative inquiry in our practice development workshops worked well as a way of respecting people’s sense of purpose and their values, and working with these to articulate, and progress towards, a desired shared future state. Implications for practice: Our use of the improvement sciences of Lean Six Sigma and person-centredness combined with appreciative inquiry demonstrates the synergistic elements of these sciences that can be optimised for use in practice development Without a change in resources, ways of providing therapy for this population can be redesigned to increase intensity Addressing culture as a key component of a practice development project resulted in an improvement in team collaboration and communication
中风后生活良好
背景:难以达到急性脑卒中患者治疗强度指南在国际上很常见。目前的英国指南建议患者每天至少接受45分钟的每种所需治疗。这篇文章详细介绍了爱尔兰一家大型教学医院急性中风病房的实践发展工作,对一个月内出院的中风患者进行的审计发现,只有27%的患者接受了被认为“足够”的物理治疗,而30%的患者在入院不到一半的时间里接受了物理治疗。目的:根据审计,我们研究了如何提高患者的治疗强度,并相应地提高他们和治疗师的护理体验质量。我们将我们的治疗范围从物理治疗扩展到职业、言语和语言治疗。我们的目标是将患者的治疗时间从平均每天8到16分钟增加到每天45分钟。方法:我们结合精益六西格玛和以人为本的改进原则,结合赞赏性调查,重新设计了当前的治疗时间方法。结果:在我们的工作之后,在没有分组上课的日子里,所有治疗的患者治疗时间累计增加了125%,在有课的日子里增加了164%。患者在治疗时间之外没有治疗互动的平均时间从5.34小时下降到2.3小时。结论:在“中风后生活良好”倡议的旗帜下引入的各种方法的结合确保了该项目促进了一种新的、更可持续的合作方式。在我们的实践发展研讨会中使用赞赏性探究是一种尊重人们的目标感和价值观的方式,并与之合作,阐明并朝着理想的共同未来状态迈进。对实践的启示:我们对精益六西格玛和以人为本的改进科学的使用,结合赞赏的探究,表明了这些科学的协同元素,可以在不改变资源的情况下优化用于实践发展,可以重新设计为这一人群提供治疗的方式,以提高强度将文化作为实践发展项目的关键组成部分,从而改善团队协作和沟通
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信