Depressive Symptoms and Perception of COVID-19 Risk in Ohio Adults

Katarina M. Bischof, P. Chakraborty, W. Miller, A. Turner
{"title":"Depressive Symptoms and Perception of COVID-19 Risk in Ohio Adults","authors":"Katarina M. Bischof, P. Chakraborty, W. Miller, A. Turner","doi":"10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We assessed the relationship between depressive symptoms and perceived COVID-19 risk in the next month.\nMethods: This analysis used survey data collected during a July 2020 cross-sectional study using a household-based probability sampling design. A total of 615 noninstitutionalized, English- and/or Spanish-speaking adults in Ohio were included. Depressive symptoms screening occurred using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). We applied survey weights so that presented analyses represent the adult population in Ohio. We performed log-risk regression modeling (generalized linear model with binomial distribution and log link) to estimate unadjusted and covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios examining the association between screening positive for depressive symptoms and perceived risk of COVID-19 in the next month.\nResults: The study population was majority female (59.1%) and White (90.3%). The mean age was 55.9 years (standard deviation (SD)=17.3). About 1 in 20 (4.6%) screened positive for depressive symptoms. A positive depressive symptoms screen was not significantly associated with perceived risk of COVID-19 in the next month (prevalence ratio [PR]=0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.25–2.24). After confounder adjustment, the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) was nearly unchanged (aPR=0.78; 95% CI=0.24–2.55).\nConclusion: As depression is often associated with anxiety and pessimism toward the future, the lack of association between depressive symptoms screening and perception of COVID-19 risk in the next month is surprising. Social withdrawal, which is also associated with depression, may have concealed any increased perceived COVID-19 risk, as depressed individuals who remained socially isolated may have had lower perceived COVID-19 risk.","PeriodicalId":74337,"journal":{"name":"Ohio journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We assessed the relationship between depressive symptoms and perceived COVID-19 risk in the next month. Methods: This analysis used survey data collected during a July 2020 cross-sectional study using a household-based probability sampling design. A total of 615 noninstitutionalized, English- and/or Spanish-speaking adults in Ohio were included. Depressive symptoms screening occurred using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). We applied survey weights so that presented analyses represent the adult population in Ohio. We performed log-risk regression modeling (generalized linear model with binomial distribution and log link) to estimate unadjusted and covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios examining the association between screening positive for depressive symptoms and perceived risk of COVID-19 in the next month. Results: The study population was majority female (59.1%) and White (90.3%). The mean age was 55.9 years (standard deviation (SD)=17.3). About 1 in 20 (4.6%) screened positive for depressive symptoms. A positive depressive symptoms screen was not significantly associated with perceived risk of COVID-19 in the next month (prevalence ratio [PR]=0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.25–2.24). After confounder adjustment, the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) was nearly unchanged (aPR=0.78; 95% CI=0.24–2.55). Conclusion: As depression is often associated with anxiety and pessimism toward the future, the lack of association between depressive symptoms screening and perception of COVID-19 risk in the next month is surprising. Social withdrawal, which is also associated with depression, may have concealed any increased perceived COVID-19 risk, as depressed individuals who remained socially isolated may have had lower perceived COVID-19 risk.
俄亥俄州成年人的抑郁症状和COVID-19风险感知
背景:我们评估抑郁症状与下个月感知的COVID-19风险之间的关系。方法:本分析使用了2020年7月采用基于家庭的概率抽样设计的横断面研究收集的调查数据。在俄亥俄州,共有615名非收容的、说英语和/或西班牙语的成年人被纳入研究。使用患者健康问卷-2 (PHQ-2)进行抑郁症状筛查。我们应用了调查权重,因此所提出的分析代表了俄亥俄州的成年人口。我们采用对数风险回归模型(具有二项分布和对数链接的广义线性模型)来估计未经调整和协变量调整的患病率,以检验抑郁症状筛查阳性与下个月COVID-19感知风险之间的关系。结果:研究人群以女性(59.1%)和白人(90.3%)为主。平均年龄55.9岁(标准差(SD)=17.3)。20人中约有1人(4.6%)的抑郁症状筛查呈阳性。抑郁症状筛查阳性与下个月COVID-19的感知风险无显著相关(患病率比[PR]=0.75;95%置信区间[CI]= 0.25-2.24)。经混杂校正后,调整后的患病率(aPR)几乎没有变化(aPR=0.78;95% CI = 0.24 - -2.55)。结论:抑郁症通常与焦虑和对未来的悲观情绪有关,因此抑郁症状筛查与下个月对COVID-19风险的感知之间缺乏关联令人惊讶。社交退缩也与抑郁症有关,它可能掩盖了任何增加的COVID-19感知风险,因为保持社交孤立的抑郁症患者可能具有较低的COVID-19感知风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信