Diferencias en la categorización de seres vivos y objetos Estudio en niños de edad escolar

Q3 Psychology
Ana García Coni, Jorge Vivas
{"title":"Diferencias en la categorización de seres vivos y objetos Estudio en niños de edad escolar","authors":"Ana García Coni, Jorge Vivas","doi":"10.14349/SUMAPSI.2018.V25.N1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many studies show that children are able to perform perceptive, thematic and taxonomical characterization, few studies investigate whether adults’ patterns -living things mostly associated with taxonomic and perceptive attributes, and nonliving things, with thematic information- resemble those of children. Thus, this paper undertook to study the types of -mainly taxonomic and thematic- attributes used by 6- to- 11-yearold children attending 1st, 3rd and 5th year of basic primary education in Mar del Plata city. This was done through a task that consisted of asking for conceptual attributes of living and nonliving things (ANIMALS, FRUITS, OBJECTS, FURNITURE). We found that thematic relations prevailed in OBJECTS and FURNITURE but not in FRUITS and ANIMALS, which matches with the idea that contextual and functional characteristics are more important for artifacts than living things. Likewise, taxonomic relations prevailed in ANIMALS and FRUITS, and its presence was much lower in OBJECTS and FURNITURE. In conclusion, we found a reverse pattern vis-a-vis that of thematic relations, in accordance with the idea that taxonomic relations are more relevant for living things given their relation to visual processing.","PeriodicalId":38992,"journal":{"name":"Suma Psicologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suma Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/SUMAPSI.2018.V25.N1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although many studies show that children are able to perform perceptive, thematic and taxonomical characterization, few studies investigate whether adults’ patterns -living things mostly associated with taxonomic and perceptive attributes, and nonliving things, with thematic information- resemble those of children. Thus, this paper undertook to study the types of -mainly taxonomic and thematic- attributes used by 6- to- 11-yearold children attending 1st, 3rd and 5th year of basic primary education in Mar del Plata city. This was done through a task that consisted of asking for conceptual attributes of living and nonliving things (ANIMALS, FRUITS, OBJECTS, FURNITURE). We found that thematic relations prevailed in OBJECTS and FURNITURE but not in FRUITS and ANIMALS, which matches with the idea that contextual and functional characteristics are more important for artifacts than living things. Likewise, taxonomic relations prevailed in ANIMALS and FRUITS, and its presence was much lower in OBJECTS and FURNITURE. In conclusion, we found a reverse pattern vis-a-vis that of thematic relations, in accordance with the idea that taxonomic relations are more relevant for living things given their relation to visual processing.
学龄儿童生物分类和学习对象的差异
尽管许多研究表明,儿童能够进行感知、主题和分类表征,但很少有研究调查成年人的模式——主要与分类和感知属性相关的生物,以及具有主题信息的非生物——是否与儿童的模式相似。因此,本文研究了马德普拉塔市小学一年级、三年级和五年级6至11岁儿童使用的主要是分类和主题属性的类型。这是通过一项任务完成的,该任务包括询问活体和非活体(动物、水果、物体、家具)的概念属性。我们发现,主题关系在物体和家具中占主导地位,而在水果和动物中不占主导地位。这与上下文和功能特征对文物比生物更重要的观点相一致。同样,在动物和水果中,分类学关系占主导地位,在物品和家具中,其存在率要低得多。总之,我们发现了与主题关系相反的模式,这与分类学关系与视觉处理的关系更相关的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suma Psicologica
Suma Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信