Exercise testing to evaluate therapeutic interventions in chronic respiratory diseases

L. Puente-Maestu, W. Stringer, R. Casaburi
{"title":"Exercise testing to evaluate therapeutic interventions in chronic respiratory diseases","authors":"L. Puente-Maestu, W. Stringer, R. Casaburi","doi":"10.23866/BRNREV:2017-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From an evidence-based perspective, performance during standardised exercise testing is of considerable importance in the multidimensional evaluation of most respiratory diseases. In this review we aim to summarise the available evidence on the responsiveness of exercise tests to various pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions, as well as the underlying mechanisms associated with the improvements. A standard test to evaluate interventions has not yet been defined and therefore there are several available formats with different types of responsiveness to interventions. Thresholds for clinically important changes are available for several tests. The mechanism of improvement is different depending on the disease process: when moderate or severe airflow limitation is present, as in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the primary mechanisms are reduced ventilatory requirement and/or enhanced ventilatory capacity via reduction of dynamic hyperinflation; in pulmonary arterial hypertension the effect of treatment is typically associated to haemodynamic improvement, while in interstitial lung diseases, the amelioration of arterial oxygen desaturation seems to be the predominant physiological factor. (BRN Rev. 2018;4(4):274-86) Corresponding author: Luis Puente-Maestu, lpuente@separ.es","PeriodicalId":87223,"journal":{"name":"Barcelona respiratory network reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barcelona respiratory network reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23866/BRNREV:2017-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

From an evidence-based perspective, performance during standardised exercise testing is of considerable importance in the multidimensional evaluation of most respiratory diseases. In this review we aim to summarise the available evidence on the responsiveness of exercise tests to various pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions, as well as the underlying mechanisms associated with the improvements. A standard test to evaluate interventions has not yet been defined and therefore there are several available formats with different types of responsiveness to interventions. Thresholds for clinically important changes are available for several tests. The mechanism of improvement is different depending on the disease process: when moderate or severe airflow limitation is present, as in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the primary mechanisms are reduced ventilatory requirement and/or enhanced ventilatory capacity via reduction of dynamic hyperinflation; in pulmonary arterial hypertension the effect of treatment is typically associated to haemodynamic improvement, while in interstitial lung diseases, the amelioration of arterial oxygen desaturation seems to be the predominant physiological factor. (BRN Rev. 2018;4(4):274-86) Corresponding author: Luis Puente-Maestu, lpuente@separ.es
运动试验评价慢性呼吸系统疾病的治疗干预措施
从循证的角度来看,标准化运动测试的表现在大多数呼吸道疾病的多维评估中具有相当重要的意义。在这篇综述中,我们旨在总结运动测试对各种药物和非药物治疗干预的反应性的现有证据,以及与改善相关的潜在机制。评估干预措施的标准测试尚未确定,因此有几种可用的形式对干预措施具有不同类型的反应性。临床上重要变化的阈值可用于多种测试。改善的机制因疾病过程而异:当存在中度或重度气流限制时,如慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD),主要机制是通过减少动态过度充气来减少通气需求和/或增强通气能力;在肺动脉高压中,治疗的效果通常与血液动力学的改善有关,而在间质性肺疾病中,动脉氧饱和度的改善似乎是主要的生理因素。(BRN Rev.2018;4(4):274-86)通讯作者:Luis Puente Maestu,lpuente@separ.es
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书