Optimizing successful balance recovery from unexpected trips and slips

Q4 Engineering
M. Brodie, Y. Okubo, D. Sturnieks, S. Lord
{"title":"Optimizing successful balance recovery from unexpected trips and slips","authors":"M. Brodie, Y. Okubo, D. Sturnieks, S. Lord","doi":"10.1299/JBSE.17-00558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately one in three people over 65 years of age fall each year. The resulting physiological and psychological trauma can lead to physical deconditioning, social isolation and early mortality. Recent research has reported balance recovery can be trained in a single session resulting in dramatic reductions in fall rates. However, most previous research has used repeated exposures to a single hazard in a fixed location and not controlled for reductions in walking speed. It follows, that the biomechanical mechanisms important for reactive balance recovery (in the absence of anticipatory adjustments) are probably not well understood. Here, we investigated the biomechanics of successful reactive balance recovery following the first exposures to unexpected trip and slip hazards in different locations. Ten healthy adults (29.1±5.6 years) completed 32 walks at fixed speed, cadence and step length over a custom 10-meter walkway while being exposed to randomly presented and located slip and trip hazards. Balance recovery kinematics were assessed using a VICON motion analysis system. Repeated exposures to unexpected hazards induced significant reductions (p≤0.05) in anteroposterior (AP) trunk sway following the trips (26.7o to 14.3o; Cohen’s d -1.24) and slips (32.7o to 19.0o; Cohen’s d -0.93). During recovery from unexpected trips, reduced AP trunk sway was strongly correlated with a more posterior centre-of-mass position relative to the stepping foot (r=0.91) and a longer step length (r=-0.71). During recovery from unexpected slips, reduced AP trunk sway was moderately correlated with slower slipping speed (r=0.54) and a less posterior centre-of-mass position relative to the stance (slipping) foot (r=-0.39). The biomechanical mechanisms required for the successful reactive balance recovery from trips and slips were different. Future experimental protocols to optimize reactive balance recovery for fall prevention should therefore use progressive exposures to both slip and trip hazards using specialized equipment and determine if similar biomechanical mechanisms are observed in young and elderly people at risk of falls.","PeriodicalId":39034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering","volume":"13 1","pages":"17-00558-17-00558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1299/JBSE.17-00558","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1299/JBSE.17-00558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Approximately one in three people over 65 years of age fall each year. The resulting physiological and psychological trauma can lead to physical deconditioning, social isolation and early mortality. Recent research has reported balance recovery can be trained in a single session resulting in dramatic reductions in fall rates. However, most previous research has used repeated exposures to a single hazard in a fixed location and not controlled for reductions in walking speed. It follows, that the biomechanical mechanisms important for reactive balance recovery (in the absence of anticipatory adjustments) are probably not well understood. Here, we investigated the biomechanics of successful reactive balance recovery following the first exposures to unexpected trip and slip hazards in different locations. Ten healthy adults (29.1±5.6 years) completed 32 walks at fixed speed, cadence and step length over a custom 10-meter walkway while being exposed to randomly presented and located slip and trip hazards. Balance recovery kinematics were assessed using a VICON motion analysis system. Repeated exposures to unexpected hazards induced significant reductions (p≤0.05) in anteroposterior (AP) trunk sway following the trips (26.7o to 14.3o; Cohen’s d -1.24) and slips (32.7o to 19.0o; Cohen’s d -0.93). During recovery from unexpected trips, reduced AP trunk sway was strongly correlated with a more posterior centre-of-mass position relative to the stepping foot (r=0.91) and a longer step length (r=-0.71). During recovery from unexpected slips, reduced AP trunk sway was moderately correlated with slower slipping speed (r=0.54) and a less posterior centre-of-mass position relative to the stance (slipping) foot (r=-0.39). The biomechanical mechanisms required for the successful reactive balance recovery from trips and slips were different. Future experimental protocols to optimize reactive balance recovery for fall prevention should therefore use progressive exposures to both slip and trip hazards using specialized equipment and determine if similar biomechanical mechanisms are observed in young and elderly people at risk of falls.
优化从意外跳闸和打滑中成功恢复平衡
每年大约有三分之一的65岁以上老人摔倒。由此产生的生理和心理创伤可导致身体机能丧失、社会孤立和过早死亡。最近的研究表明,平衡恢复可以在一次训练中进行,从而显著降低跌倒率。然而,之前的大多数研究都是在固定的地点重复暴露于单一的危险中,而不是控制步行速度的降低。因此,对于反应性平衡恢复(在没有预期调整的情况下)重要的生物力学机制可能还没有得到很好的理解。在这里,我们研究了在不同位置首次暴露于意外绊倒和滑倒危险后成功恢复反应性平衡的生物力学。10名健康成年人(29.1±5.6岁)以固定的速度、节奏和步长在一条定制的10米人行道上完成32次步行,同时暴露在随机呈现和定位的滑动和绊倒危险中。使用VICON运动分析系统评估平衡恢复运动学。反复暴露于意想不到的危险中导致旅行后前后(AP)躯干摇摆显著降低(p≤0.05)(26.70 ~ 14.30;科恩指数下跌1.24点),下跌32.70点至19.00点;科恩的d -0.93)。在意外绊倒后的恢复过程中,相对于踏脚,较后的质量中心位置(r=0.91)和较长的步长(r=-0.71)与较低的AP躯干摆动密切相关。在意外滑倒的恢复过程中,AP躯干摆动的减少与较慢的滑动速度(r=0.54)和相对于站立(滑动)脚的较后的质量中心位置(r=-0.39)有一定的相关性。从起下钻和卡瓦中成功恢复反应平衡所需的生物力学机制是不同的。因此,为了优化预防跌倒的反应性平衡恢复,未来的实验方案应该使用专门的设备逐步暴露于滑倒和绊倒危险中,并确定在有跌倒风险的年轻人和老年人中是否观察到类似的生物力学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering
Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信