Qualification and quantification of plasma cell-free DNA after long-term storage conditions in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a pilot study
A. Bozkurt, Mehmet Gürbüzel, İ. Sayar, Soner Baydeniz, Y. Arslan
{"title":"Qualification and quantification of plasma cell-free DNA after long-term storage conditions in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a pilot study","authors":"A. Bozkurt, Mehmet Gürbüzel, İ. Sayar, Soner Baydeniz, Y. Arslan","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2022-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Free DNA is used as a cancer biomarker due to its low cost, high applicability, and fast, reliable results compared to invasive methods. This study aimed to evaluate the quantification of plasma-free DNA after long-term storage conditions and perform qualification through single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) screening based on this DNA. Methods Plasma-free DNA samples were quickly isolated from the peripheral blood of both the benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and control group participants and then maintained at −80 °C for four years. Upon thawing, first, free DNA was purified and fluorometric measurements were taken to determine the amount of DNA. Subsequently, the rs6983267, rs12628, and rs1799939 SNPs were screened in the CCAT2, HRAS, and RET genes, respectively. Results Significant results were obtained from the fluorometric measurements in terms of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in SNPs rs6983267, rs12628, and rs1799939 in the BPH group compared to the healthy individuals. Conclusions The data show that fluorometric ssDNA measurements are suitable for quantifying free DNA. The fact that SNP screening can be done successfully in both healthy people and BPH patients suggests that plasma-free DNA can be stored in the laboratory under appropriate conditions.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":"383 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Free DNA is used as a cancer biomarker due to its low cost, high applicability, and fast, reliable results compared to invasive methods. This study aimed to evaluate the quantification of plasma-free DNA after long-term storage conditions and perform qualification through single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) screening based on this DNA. Methods Plasma-free DNA samples were quickly isolated from the peripheral blood of both the benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and control group participants and then maintained at −80 °C for four years. Upon thawing, first, free DNA was purified and fluorometric measurements were taken to determine the amount of DNA. Subsequently, the rs6983267, rs12628, and rs1799939 SNPs were screened in the CCAT2, HRAS, and RET genes, respectively. Results Significant results were obtained from the fluorometric measurements in terms of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in SNPs rs6983267, rs12628, and rs1799939 in the BPH group compared to the healthy individuals. Conclusions The data show that fluorometric ssDNA measurements are suitable for quantifying free DNA. The fact that SNP screening can be done successfully in both healthy people and BPH patients suggests that plasma-free DNA can be stored in the laboratory under appropriate conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.