Evaluation of doctors’ experience of psychodynamic psychotherapy training at Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Gwenllian Collin, Oliver Turner, Vikram Luthra
{"title":"Evaluation of doctors’ experience of psychodynamic psychotherapy training at Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Gwenllian Collin,&nbsp;Oliver Turner,&nbsp;Vikram Luthra","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Developing psychotherapeutic competencies is an essential part of psychiatric training. All Core Trainees at Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LYPFT) saw a patient for psychodynamic psychotherapy until 2020. Due to the pandemic, all face-to-face appointments at the LYPFT Medical Psychotherapy Service were paused from March 2020. Patients could choose whether to continue therapy remotely or defer therapy. Supervision was also moved to a remote format. Face-to-face therapy sessions resumed from August 2020, with new infection control procedures. This project aimed to establish doctors’ experience of training in delivering psychodynamic psychotherapy at LYPFT during the pandemic. A two-step methodology was used: an online survey including qualitative and quantitative analysis of the impact of the pandemic; and semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. The online survey had a response rate of 68%. Four patients deferred therapy; the mean deferral length was two months. Ten respondents had sessions cancelled due to infection/self-isolation. Thirteen respondents (commencing therapy pre-pandemic) delivered therapy face-to-face (without personal protective equipment [PPE]). During the pandemic five respondents delivered therapy via phone, six face-to-face with PPE. Thirteen were concerned about attaining psychotherapy competencies. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified three main themes (with subthemes). Challenges of delivering therapy during the pandemic were identified, as well as areas of good practice and opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"39 3","pages":"425-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing psychotherapeutic competencies is an essential part of psychiatric training. All Core Trainees at Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LYPFT) saw a patient for psychodynamic psychotherapy until 2020. Due to the pandemic, all face-to-face appointments at the LYPFT Medical Psychotherapy Service were paused from March 2020. Patients could choose whether to continue therapy remotely or defer therapy. Supervision was also moved to a remote format. Face-to-face therapy sessions resumed from August 2020, with new infection control procedures. This project aimed to establish doctors’ experience of training in delivering psychodynamic psychotherapy at LYPFT during the pandemic. A two-step methodology was used: an online survey including qualitative and quantitative analysis of the impact of the pandemic; and semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. The online survey had a response rate of 68%. Four patients deferred therapy; the mean deferral length was two months. Ten respondents had sessions cancelled due to infection/self-isolation. Thirteen respondents (commencing therapy pre-pandemic) delivered therapy face-to-face (without personal protective equipment [PPE]). During the pandemic five respondents delivered therapy via phone, six face-to-face with PPE. Thirteen were concerned about attaining psychotherapy competencies. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified three main themes (with subthemes). Challenges of delivering therapy during the pandemic were identified, as well as areas of good practice and opportunities.

在COVID - 19大流行期间,利兹和约克合作伙伴NHS基金会信托基金的医生心理动力心理治疗培训经验评估
培养心理治疗能力是心理训练的重要组成部分。利兹和约克伙伴关系NHS基金会信托基金会(LYPFT)的所有核心受训人员都为一名患者进行了心理动力学心理治疗,直到2020年。由于疫情,LYPFT医疗心理治疗服务中心的所有面对面预约从2020年3月起暂停。患者可以选择是远程继续治疗还是推迟治疗。监督也被转移到远程形式。面对面治疗从2020年8月开始恢复,采用了新的感染控制程序。该项目旨在建立医生在疫情期间在LYPFT提供心理动力学心理治疗的培训经验。采用了两步方法:一项在线调查,包括对疫情影响的定性和定量分析;以及主题分析的半结构化访谈。在线调查的回复率为68%。4名患者推迟治疗;平均延期时间为两个月。10名受访者因感染/自我隔离而取消了治疗。13名受访者(在大流行前开始治疗)面对面进行治疗(无需个人防护设备[PPP])。在疫情期间,五名受访者通过电话进行治疗,六名受访者使用个人防护装备进行面对面治疗。13人关心获得心理治疗能力。对访谈的专题分析确定了三个主要主题(附副主题)。确定了在疫情期间提供治疗的挑战,以及良好实践和机会的领域。[发件人]《英国心理治疗杂志》版权归Wiley Blackwell所有,未经版权持有人明确书面许可,不得将其内容复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到列表服务。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可能会被删节。对复印件的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参考材料的原始发布版本以获取完整信息。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信