Understanding the Factors Associated with US Dermatology Resident Trainees' Diagnostic Confidence and Skill for Skin of Color Pathology

A. Jeanfreau, K. Beiter, D. Hilton
{"title":"Understanding the Factors Associated with US Dermatology Resident Trainees' Diagnostic Confidence and Skill for Skin of Color Pathology","authors":"A. Jeanfreau, K. Beiter, D. Hilton","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inequities in dermatologic health outcomes translate to worsened clinical outcomes for minority groups. For example, despite a lower incidence of skin cancer overall, African Americans are diagnosed at later stages with greater degrees of lymph node involvement. This has been shown to lead to disproportionate mortality when compared to lighter skinned individuals.  Medical education materials contain a significantly lower percentage of skin of color (SOC) images than of lighter skin and research has indicated lower diagnostic accuracy of dermatologic conditions in darker skin by U.S. medical students. The objective of this study was to explore U.S. resident dermatologists’ ability to accurately identify skin pathology among SOC patients verus lighter skin to potentially identify gaps in training that may contribute to this disproportionate morbidity and mortality.\nMethods: A cross-sectional electronic REDCap survey open to all U.S. dermatology residents asked participants their basic demographics (e.g., level of training, racial and ethnic identity) and program characteristics (e.g., geographical location, proportion of patients by Fitzpatrick type, presence of a dedicated SOC clinic). This data was correlated with participant visual diagnostic accuracy on a 22-item multiple choice quiz (images selected by a senior academic dermatologist) of characteristic nonmalignant and malignant conditions in lighter skin and SOC.\nResults: Residents preferentially misdiagnosed malignant lesions in SOC over lighter skin (p <.0001) and preferentially misdiagnosed malignant lesions in SOC over nonmalignant lesions in SOC (p <.001). None of the residents’ basic demographic or program characteristic variables had significant relationships with any assessment of performance.\nConclusion: Dermatologists should maintain a high clinical suspicion for malignant conditions in patients with darker skin types, given that these lesions are the most preferentially misdiagnosed and the fact that these lesions carry higher risks for morbidity and mortality. Dermatology residency programs should instill efforts to emphasize correct detection of malignant lesions amongst those with skin of color. ","PeriodicalId":74803,"journal":{"name":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inequities in dermatologic health outcomes translate to worsened clinical outcomes for minority groups. For example, despite a lower incidence of skin cancer overall, African Americans are diagnosed at later stages with greater degrees of lymph node involvement. This has been shown to lead to disproportionate mortality when compared to lighter skinned individuals.  Medical education materials contain a significantly lower percentage of skin of color (SOC) images than of lighter skin and research has indicated lower diagnostic accuracy of dermatologic conditions in darker skin by U.S. medical students. The objective of this study was to explore U.S. resident dermatologists’ ability to accurately identify skin pathology among SOC patients verus lighter skin to potentially identify gaps in training that may contribute to this disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Methods: A cross-sectional electronic REDCap survey open to all U.S. dermatology residents asked participants their basic demographics (e.g., level of training, racial and ethnic identity) and program characteristics (e.g., geographical location, proportion of patients by Fitzpatrick type, presence of a dedicated SOC clinic). This data was correlated with participant visual diagnostic accuracy on a 22-item multiple choice quiz (images selected by a senior academic dermatologist) of characteristic nonmalignant and malignant conditions in lighter skin and SOC. Results: Residents preferentially misdiagnosed malignant lesions in SOC over lighter skin (p <.0001) and preferentially misdiagnosed malignant lesions in SOC over nonmalignant lesions in SOC (p <.001). None of the residents’ basic demographic or program characteristic variables had significant relationships with any assessment of performance. Conclusion: Dermatologists should maintain a high clinical suspicion for malignant conditions in patients with darker skin types, given that these lesions are the most preferentially misdiagnosed and the fact that these lesions carry higher risks for morbidity and mortality. Dermatology residency programs should instill efforts to emphasize correct detection of malignant lesions amongst those with skin of color. 
了解与美国皮肤科住院实习医师对皮肤颜色病理诊断信心和技能相关的因素
背景:皮肤科健康结果的不公平导致少数群体的临床结果恶化。例如,尽管癌症的发病率总体较低,但非洲裔美国人在晚期被诊断为淋巴结受累程度更高。与肤色较浅的人相比,这已被证明会导致不成比例的死亡率。医学教育材料中彩色皮肤(SOC)图像的比例明显低于浅色皮肤,研究表明,美国医学生对深色皮肤皮肤病的诊断准确性较低。本研究的目的是探索美国常驻皮肤科医生准确识别SOC患者皮肤病理的能力,而不是浅色皮肤,以潜在地识别可能导致这种不成比例的发病率和死亡率的训练差距。方法:一项向所有美国皮肤科住院医师开放的横断面电子REDCap调查询问了参与者的基本人口统计数据(如培训水平、种族和民族身份)和项目特征(如地理位置、按Fitzpatrick类型划分的患者比例、是否有专门的SOC诊所)。这些数据与参与者在22项多项选择测验(由高级皮肤科医生选择的图像)中对浅色皮肤和SOC的特征性非恶性和恶性状况的视觉诊断准确性相关SOC中的非恶性病变(p<0.001)。居民的基本人口统计学或项目特征变量与任何绩效评估都没有显著关系。结论:皮肤科医生应该对深色皮肤患者的恶性疾病保持高度的临床怀疑,因为这些病变最容易被误诊,而且这些病变的发病率和死亡率更高。皮肤科住院医师项目应努力强调在有色人种中正确检测恶性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信