Overview of Gc Tests Used to Evaluate Composite–Composite Adhesive Joints

IF 1 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
J. Cañas, L. Távara, A. Blázquez, A. Estefani
{"title":"Overview of Gc Tests Used to Evaluate Composite–Composite Adhesive Joints","authors":"J. Cañas, L. Távara, A. Blázquez, A. Estefani","doi":"10.1142/S1756973718420027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of composite–composite bonded joints is a very important issue for industries, especially for the aerospace sector. A deficient joint may stop the manufacturing process and its repairing may include very high costs. Nowadays, the quality of the joint is obtained by means of interlaminar fracture toughness tests, estimating the [Formula: see text] value (Energy Release Rate used to produce crack propagation) over coupons with (theoretically) the same conditions as those included in an actual part. Usually, [Formula: see text] is obtained by means of a Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) test. Although DCB is the reference test, it may present some drawbacks when a non-symmetrical coupon is used and when the adherents stiffness is low. An alternative to DCB is the Climbing Drum Peel (CDP) test which is able to address some of the DCB drawbacks. Nevertheless, both tests need the use of a universal testing machine, then they cannot be done in situ. In the present investigation, DCB and CDP main characteristics are analyzed and a new device, called Horizontal Drum Peel (HDP), which includes the advantages of previous tests and the possibility to perform the test over an actual part is presented.","PeriodicalId":43242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multiscale Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1756973718420027","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multiscale Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1756973718420027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The quality of composite–composite bonded joints is a very important issue for industries, especially for the aerospace sector. A deficient joint may stop the manufacturing process and its repairing may include very high costs. Nowadays, the quality of the joint is obtained by means of interlaminar fracture toughness tests, estimating the [Formula: see text] value (Energy Release Rate used to produce crack propagation) over coupons with (theoretically) the same conditions as those included in an actual part. Usually, [Formula: see text] is obtained by means of a Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) test. Although DCB is the reference test, it may present some drawbacks when a non-symmetrical coupon is used and when the adherents stiffness is low. An alternative to DCB is the Climbing Drum Peel (CDP) test which is able to address some of the DCB drawbacks. Nevertheless, both tests need the use of a universal testing machine, then they cannot be done in situ. In the present investigation, DCB and CDP main characteristics are analyzed and a new device, called Horizontal Drum Peel (HDP), which includes the advantages of previous tests and the possibility to perform the test over an actual part is presented.
评价复合材料-复合材料粘合接头的气相色谱试验综述
复合材料-复合材料粘结接头的质量对工业来说是一个非常重要的问题,尤其是对航空航天部门来说。有缺陷的接头可能会停止制造过程,其修复可能包括非常高的成本。如今,接头的质量是通过层间断裂韧性测试来获得的,在(理论上)与实际零件中包含的条件相同的条件下,通过试片估计[公式:见正文]值(用于产生裂纹扩展的能量释放率)。通常,[公式:见正文]是通过双悬臂梁(DCB)试验获得的。尽管DCB是参考测试,但当使用非对称试片和粘附物刚度较低时,它可能会出现一些缺点。DCB的一种替代方案是爬升滚筒剥离(CDP)测试,它能够解决DCB的一些缺点。然而,这两项测试都需要使用通用测试机,因此无法在现场进行。在本研究中,分析了DCB和CDP的主要特性,并提出了一种称为水平转鼓剥离(HDP)的新装置,该装置包括以前测试的优点以及在实际零件上进行测试的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multiscale Modelling
Journal of Multiscale Modelling MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信