Analysis of Importance and Performance of Mountain Village Revitalization Policy for Balanced Regional Development: Focused on Forestry and Agriculture Policy in 8 Regional Governments

Q3 Social Sciences
Jinhae Chae, Seong-Hak Kim, Byung-Hoon Kang
{"title":"Analysis of Importance and Performance of Mountain Village Revitalization Policy for Balanced Regional Development: Focused on Forestry and Agriculture Policy in 8 Regional Governments","authors":"Jinhae Chae, Seong-Hak Kim, Byung-Hoon Kang","doi":"10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.2.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Due to the recent demographic crisis driving the extinction of certain local communities, it is necessary to promote core projects to revitalize mountain village and rural areas.Methods: This study collected a total of 443 policy projects based on major policies and major business plans in the forestry and agricultural sectors of the eight regional governments in 2021. The collected 443 policy projects related to revitalizing the mountain villages were classified by 3 experts into 5 domains in the forestry sector, which further broke down into 27 types, 3 domains in the agricultural sector, and which further broke down into 23 types, for a total of 8 domains and 50 types, and an online survey of 42 policy stakeholders was then conducted. Analysis methods were t-test and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA), and implications were derived through comparison between forestry and agricultural sectors.Results: The analysis produced several findings. first, it was positive that many projects in the sustainability field appeared in both forestry and agricultural sectors, but it was found that the policy projects needed to be reviewed due to the lack of types corresponding to projects in the intensive promotion area. Intensive core efforts included \"discovering forest cultural assets\" and \"creating forests to improve the environment.\" Second, it is necessary to pay attention to the forestry policy sector, as the forestry policy sector were generally lower in importance and performance than the agricultural policy sector. Third, the domains with high importance and performance to mountain village revitalization were \"forest welfare services\", \"improving settlement environment\", and \"increasing incomes\" while the domains with low importance and performance were mountain villages and forest culture areas.Conclusion: In summary, to revitalize mountain villages in response to the issue of the pending extinction of local communities, forest welfare service projects should continuously be promoted and strategic responses are required for \"discovering forest cultural assets\" and \"creating forests for environmental improvement,\" which are suggested as key strategic project types.","PeriodicalId":52383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.2.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objective: Due to the recent demographic crisis driving the extinction of certain local communities, it is necessary to promote core projects to revitalize mountain village and rural areas.Methods: This study collected a total of 443 policy projects based on major policies and major business plans in the forestry and agricultural sectors of the eight regional governments in 2021. The collected 443 policy projects related to revitalizing the mountain villages were classified by 3 experts into 5 domains in the forestry sector, which further broke down into 27 types, 3 domains in the agricultural sector, and which further broke down into 23 types, for a total of 8 domains and 50 types, and an online survey of 42 policy stakeholders was then conducted. Analysis methods were t-test and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA), and implications were derived through comparison between forestry and agricultural sectors.Results: The analysis produced several findings. first, it was positive that many projects in the sustainability field appeared in both forestry and agricultural sectors, but it was found that the policy projects needed to be reviewed due to the lack of types corresponding to projects in the intensive promotion area. Intensive core efforts included "discovering forest cultural assets" and "creating forests to improve the environment." Second, it is necessary to pay attention to the forestry policy sector, as the forestry policy sector were generally lower in importance and performance than the agricultural policy sector. Third, the domains with high importance and performance to mountain village revitalization were "forest welfare services", "improving settlement environment", and "increasing incomes" while the domains with low importance and performance were mountain villages and forest culture areas.Conclusion: In summary, to revitalize mountain villages in response to the issue of the pending extinction of local communities, forest welfare service projects should continuously be promoted and strategic responses are required for "discovering forest cultural assets" and "creating forests for environmental improvement," which are suggested as key strategic project types.
乡村振兴政策对区域均衡发展的重要性及绩效分析——以8个区政府的林业和农业政策为例
背景与目的:由于最近的人口危机导致一些地方社区的灭绝,有必要推动振兴山村和农村的核心项目。方法:本研究基于八个地区政府2021年林业和农业部门的重大政策和重大业务计划,共收集了443个政策项目。收集到的443个与山村振兴相关的政策项目,由3位专家划分为林业领域的5个领域,再细分为27个类型,农业领域的3个领域,再细分为23个类型,共8个领域50个类型,并对42位政策相关方进行了在线调查。分析方法采用t检验和重要性绩效分析(IPA),并通过林业和农业部门的比较得出结论。结果:分析产生了几个发现。首先,可持续领域的许多项目出现在林业和农业部门是积极的,但由于缺乏与密集促进领域的项目相对应的类型,因此需要审查政策项目。密集的核心工作包括“发现森林文化资产”和“创造森林以改善环境”。其次,需要关注林业政策部门,林业政策部门的重要性和绩效普遍低于农业政策部门。③对山村振兴重要性和绩效较高的领域为“森林福利服务”、“改善人居环境”和“增加收入”,而重要性和绩效较低的领域为山村和森林文化区。结论:综上所述,为应对当地社区濒临灭绝的问题,山村振兴应持续推进森林福利服务项目,并提出“发现森林文化资产”和“创造森林改善环境”作为重点战略项目类型的战略对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信