Examining Retention-at-Length of Pelagic Fishes Caught in the Fall Midwater Trawl Survey

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
L. Mitchell, U. Fish, Randall D. Baxter
{"title":"Examining Retention-at-Length of Pelagic Fishes Caught in the Fall Midwater Trawl Survey","authors":"L. Mitchell, U. Fish, Randall D. Baxter","doi":"10.15447/SFEWS.2021V19ISS2ART5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fall Midwater Trawl Survey has provided data on aquatic organisms in the San Francisco Estuary for over five decades. In 2014–2015, a study was conducted to investigate and quantify the efficiency of this trawl for catching the endangered fish species Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus). In an analysis based on that study, we calculated retention probability—the probability that a Delta Smelt is retained in the cod end of the trawl—as a function of fish length and fit a selectivity curve reflecting the relationship between size and retention. Here we return to the same gear efficiency study and further utilize the data set by (1) fitting selectivity curves for three additional pelagic fish species: Threadfin Shad (Dorosoma petenense), American Shad (Alosa sapidissima), and Mississippi Silverside (Menidia beryllina), (2) refitting the selectivity curve for Delta Smelt to incorporate between-haul variability, and (3) calculating the lengths of 50% and 95% retention in order to characterize and compare the resulting selectivity curves. We also present retention data on age-0 Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), all of which were retained in the cod end. We found that Threadfin Shad, American Shad, and Delta Smelt are 95% retained at 45, 49, and 61 mm fork length, respectively. Because data were limited for Mississippi Silverside, American Shad, and age-0 Striped Bass, we used body shape, in conjunction with retention data, to develop hypotheses about selectivity based on whether each species’ body shape resembles that of Threadfin Shad, which are more deep-bodied and laterally compressed, or Delta Smelt, which are more fusiform. We also found that retention-at-length was more variable for Delta Smelt than for Threadfin Shad, potentially because length is a good predictor of retention in deep-bodied, laterally compressed fish whereas maximum girth is a better predictor of retention in fusiform fish.","PeriodicalId":38364,"journal":{"name":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15447/SFEWS.2021V19ISS2ART5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Fall Midwater Trawl Survey has provided data on aquatic organisms in the San Francisco Estuary for over five decades. In 2014–2015, a study was conducted to investigate and quantify the efficiency of this trawl for catching the endangered fish species Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus). In an analysis based on that study, we calculated retention probability—the probability that a Delta Smelt is retained in the cod end of the trawl—as a function of fish length and fit a selectivity curve reflecting the relationship between size and retention. Here we return to the same gear efficiency study and further utilize the data set by (1) fitting selectivity curves for three additional pelagic fish species: Threadfin Shad (Dorosoma petenense), American Shad (Alosa sapidissima), and Mississippi Silverside (Menidia beryllina), (2) refitting the selectivity curve for Delta Smelt to incorporate between-haul variability, and (3) calculating the lengths of 50% and 95% retention in order to characterize and compare the resulting selectivity curves. We also present retention data on age-0 Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), all of which were retained in the cod end. We found that Threadfin Shad, American Shad, and Delta Smelt are 95% retained at 45, 49, and 61 mm fork length, respectively. Because data were limited for Mississippi Silverside, American Shad, and age-0 Striped Bass, we used body shape, in conjunction with retention data, to develop hypotheses about selectivity based on whether each species’ body shape resembles that of Threadfin Shad, which are more deep-bodied and laterally compressed, or Delta Smelt, which are more fusiform. We also found that retention-at-length was more variable for Delta Smelt than for Threadfin Shad, potentially because length is a good predictor of retention in deep-bodied, laterally compressed fish whereas maximum girth is a better predictor of retention in fusiform fish.
检查在秋季中水拖网调查中捕获的远洋鱼类的滞留长度
秋季中水拖网调查提供了旧金山河口50多年来水生生物的数据。2014-2015年,研究人员对这种拖网捕捞濒危鱼类三角洲胡瓜鱼的效率进行了调查和量化。在基于该研究的分析中,我们计算了保留概率——三角洲甜瓜在拖网的鳕鱼末端被保留的概率——作为鱼长度的函数,并拟合了一条反映大小和保留之间关系的选择性曲线。在这里,我们回到相同的渔具效率研究,并进一步利用数据集:(1)拟合另外三种中游鱼类的选择性曲线:Threadfin Shad (Dorosoma petenense), American Shad (Alosa sapidissima)和Mississippi Silverside (Menidia beryllina);(2)重新调整Delta Smelt的选择性曲线,以纳入运输之间的变化;(3)计算50%和95%保留的长度,以表征和比较所得的选择性曲线。我们还提供了0岁条纹鲈鱼(Morone saxatilis)的保留数据,所有这些数据都保留在鳕鱼端。我们发现Threadfin Shad, American Shad和Delta Smelt分别在45,49和61 mm叉长时保留了95%。由于密西西比银鱼、美国鲥鱼和0岁条纹鲈鱼的数据有限,我们使用身体形状,结合保留数据,根据每个物种的身体形状是否与Threadfin Shad(身体更深,横向压缩)或Delta Smelt(身体更梭状)相似,来提出关于选择性的假设。我们还发现,与长尾鱼相比,长尾鱼的保留率变化更大,这可能是因为长度是深身、侧向压缩鱼类保留率的良好预测指标,而最大周长是梭状鱼保留率的更好预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信