What Some Books Leave Out: Recent Cases of Negative Bias

W. Schumm
{"title":"What Some Books Leave Out: Recent Cases of Negative Bias","authors":"W. Schumm","doi":"10.34297/ajbsr.2021.13.001935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citation bias and confirmation bias, as well as various forms of scientific misconduct, are well known concerns within the scientific community. Such types of bias usually oversell scientific or theoretical arguments. Here another type of bias, negative bias, is when authors undersell their argu ments by overlooking scientific evidence that would support or would have supported their arguments. Scholars need to be aware of the potential for both types of bias, positive and negative, when evaluating the research literature and preparing literature reviews.","PeriodicalId":93072,"journal":{"name":"American journal of biomedical science & research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of biomedical science & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34297/ajbsr.2021.13.001935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citation bias and confirmation bias, as well as various forms of scientific misconduct, are well known concerns within the scientific community. Such types of bias usually oversell scientific or theoretical arguments. Here another type of bias, negative bias, is when authors undersell their argu ments by overlooking scientific evidence that would support or would have supported their arguments. Scholars need to be aware of the potential for both types of bias, positive and negative, when evaluating the research literature and preparing literature reviews.
一些书遗漏了什么:最近的负面偏见案例
引用偏见和确认偏见,以及各种形式的科学不端行为,是科学界众所周知的问题。这种类型的偏见通常会夸大科学或理论论点。在这里,另一种类型的偏见,即负面偏见,是指作者忽视了支持或已经支持他们论点的科学证据,从而低估了他们的论点。学者们在评估研究文献和准备文献综述时,需要意识到存在积极和消极两种类型偏见的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信