A scoping review of supervised learning modelling and data-driven optimisation in monoclonal antibody process development

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Tien Dung Pham , Chaitanya Manapragada , Yuan Sun , Robert Bassett , Uwe Aickelin
{"title":"A scoping review of supervised learning modelling and data-driven optimisation in monoclonal antibody process development","authors":"Tien Dung Pham ,&nbsp;Chaitanya Manapragada ,&nbsp;Yuan Sun ,&nbsp;Robert Bassett ,&nbsp;Uwe Aickelin","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2022.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Supervised learning modelling and data-driven optimisation (SLDO) methods have only recently gathered interest in the monoclonal antibody (mAb) platform process development application, but have already demonstrated their advantages over traditional approaches in reducing development costs and accelerating research efforts. With potential usage in multiple unit operations, there is a need for mapping existing SLDO methodologies with the corresponding mAb applications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a scoping review of mAb process development studies with at least one SLDO method published prior to April 26, 2022. A team of four independent reviewers conducted a search and synthesised characteristics of the eligible studies from four literature databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 30 relevant studies from 1785 citations and 118 full-text papers. 70% were upstream studies (n = 21), and the majority of papers were published between 2010 and 2022 (n = 27, 90%). Multivariate data analysis (MVDA) techniques were identified as the most common SLDO methods (n = 11), and were typically used to model heterogeneous and high-dimensional bioprocess data. While the main usage of SLDO in process development was predictive modelling, a few studies also focused on data pre-processing, knowledge transfer, and optimisation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the data challenges inherent to the mAb industry, SLDO has been demonstrated to be an efficient solution to some process development use cases such as knowledge transfer, process characterisation, optimisation, and predictive modelling. As biopharmaceutical companies are advancing their digital transformation, SLDO methods will need to be further developed and studied from a more integrative perspective to remain competitive against other platform development approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100080"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508122000710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Supervised learning modelling and data-driven optimisation (SLDO) methods have only recently gathered interest in the monoclonal antibody (mAb) platform process development application, but have already demonstrated their advantages over traditional approaches in reducing development costs and accelerating research efforts. With potential usage in multiple unit operations, there is a need for mapping existing SLDO methodologies with the corresponding mAb applications.

Methods

We performed a scoping review of mAb process development studies with at least one SLDO method published prior to April 26, 2022. A team of four independent reviewers conducted a search and synthesised characteristics of the eligible studies from four literature databases.

Results

We identified 30 relevant studies from 1785 citations and 118 full-text papers. 70% were upstream studies (n = 21), and the majority of papers were published between 2010 and 2022 (n = 27, 90%). Multivariate data analysis (MVDA) techniques were identified as the most common SLDO methods (n = 11), and were typically used to model heterogeneous and high-dimensional bioprocess data. While the main usage of SLDO in process development was predictive modelling, a few studies also focused on data pre-processing, knowledge transfer, and optimisation.

Conclusions

Despite the data challenges inherent to the mAb industry, SLDO has been demonstrated to be an efficient solution to some process development use cases such as knowledge transfer, process characterisation, optimisation, and predictive modelling. As biopharmaceutical companies are advancing their digital transformation, SLDO methods will need to be further developed and studied from a more integrative perspective to remain competitive against other platform development approaches.

单克隆抗体过程开发中监督学习建模和数据驱动优化的范围综述
监督学习建模和数据驱动优化(SLDO)方法最近才引起人们对单克隆抗体(mAb)平台过程开发应用的兴趣,但已经证明了它们在降低开发成本和加速研究工作方面优于传统方法的优势。由于可能在多个单元操作中使用,因此需要将现有的SLDO方法与相应的mAb应用程序进行映射。方法:我们对2022年4月26日之前发表的至少一种SLDO方法的单抗工艺开发研究进行了范围审查。一个由四名独立审稿人组成的小组从四个文献数据库中检索并综合了符合条件的研究的特征。结果我们从1785次引用和118篇全文论文中筛选出30篇相关研究。70%为上游研究(n = 21),大部分论文发表于2010 - 2022年(n = 27, 90%)。多变量数据分析(MVDA)技术被认为是最常见的SLDO方法(n = 11),通常用于模拟异质和高维生物过程数据。虽然SLDO在工艺开发中的主要用途是预测建模,但也有一些研究侧重于数据预处理、知识转移和优化。尽管单克隆抗体行业存在固有的数据挑战,但SLDO已被证明是一些工艺开发用例(如知识转移、工艺表征、优化和预测建模)的有效解决方案。随着生物制药公司推进数字化转型,SLDO方法需要从更综合的角度进一步发展和研究,以保持与其他平台开发方法的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信