Work Resilience Scale

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000780

Doudou Liu, Xue Meng, Chaoping Li, Songke Xie

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the WRS-C (Work Resilience Scale – Chinese version) through two studies. In Study 1 (Sample 1: N = 463), we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and identified the two-factor solution representing work resilience after translating the Work Resilience Scale (WRS) into Chinese. In Study 2, the psychometric properties of the WRS-C were investigated in two samples (Sample 2: N = 477; Sample 3: N = 374). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirms a two-factor structure. Furthermore, the WRS-C shows measurement invariance across groups by gender, age, job tenure, and education level. Furthermore, the results provide evidence for the convergent and concurrent validity of the WRS-C. In addition, its predictive validity has been demonstrated through its associations with mental health outcomes, performance outcomes, and attitude outcomes. Overall, the WRS-C is a reliable and valid instrument in the Chinese context, which can be utilized in future research and practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

工作弹性量表

摘要：本研究旨在通过两项研究来调查WRS-C（中文版工作弹性量表）的心理测量特性。在研究1（样本1:N=463）中，我们进行了探索性因素分析（EFA），并在将工作弹性量表（WRS）翻译成中文后确定了代表工作弹性的双因素解决方案。在研究2中，在两个样本中研究了WRS-C的心理测量特性（样本2:N=477；样本3:N=374）。验证性因素分析（CFA）证实了一种双因素结构。此外，WRS-C显示了性别、年龄、工作年限和教育水平在不同群体中的测量不变性。此外，研究结果为WRS-C的收敛性和并发性提供了证据。此外，其预测有效性已通过其与心理健康结果、表现结果和态度结果的关联得到证明。总体而言，WRS-C在中国是一种可靠有效的工具，可用于未来的研究和实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The main purpose of the EJPA is to present important articles which provide seminal information on both theoretical and applied developments in this field. Articles reporting the construction of new measures or an advancement of an existing measure are given priority. The journal is directed to practitioners as well as to academicians: The conviction of its editors is that the discipline of psychological assessment should, necessarily and firmly, be attached to the roots of psychological science, while going deeply into all the consequences of its applied, practice-oriented development.