Comparison of global registry of acute coronary events and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk scores in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

S. Routray, C. Satpathy, N. Mohanty, Bijaykumar Dash, R. Satapathy
{"title":"Comparison of global registry of acute coronary events and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk scores in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome","authors":"S. Routray, C. Satpathy, N. Mohanty, Bijaykumar Dash, R. Satapathy","doi":"10.4103/jcpc.jcpc_25_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores in predicting coronary disease severity in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have not been proved. Aims: We aimed to compare the GRACE score with TIMI risk score for prediction of the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Settings and Design: This was an observational cross-sectional study. Subjects and Methods: Total 202 NSTE-ACS (NSTE myocardial infarction and unstable angina) patients were included. The GRACE and TIMI scores were estimated. Coronary angiogram was done and the Gensini score and vessel score were used to assess the severity of CAD. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software version 27.0 was used for statistical analysis. For comparison of two means, independent sample t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test was used, while for more than two means, one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis test was used. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied for the predictability of GRACE and TIMI scores for severity of disease. Results: A positive association between the Gensini score and vessel score was observed with both the GRACE (P = 0.001) and TIMI (P = 0.001) scores. The area under the ROC curve for the GRACE score was 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.676–0.854), significantly superior to the area under the ROC curve of the TIMI score (0.715; 95% CI = 0.618–0.812). Risk factors such as higher age, hypertension, smoking history, dyslipidemia, ECG changes such as ST deviation and T inversion, and Killip classification showed a statistically significant association with severity of disease. Conclusions: Both the GRACE and TIMI risk scores were a good predictor of angiographic severity of CAD in patients with NSTE-ACS, and the GRACE score was found to be superior to the TIMI risk score.","PeriodicalId":31371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"106 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcpc.jcpc_25_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores in predicting coronary disease severity in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have not been proved. Aims: We aimed to compare the GRACE score with TIMI risk score for prediction of the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Settings and Design: This was an observational cross-sectional study. Subjects and Methods: Total 202 NSTE-ACS (NSTE myocardial infarction and unstable angina) patients were included. The GRACE and TIMI scores were estimated. Coronary angiogram was done and the Gensini score and vessel score were used to assess the severity of CAD. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software version 27.0 was used for statistical analysis. For comparison of two means, independent sample t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test was used, while for more than two means, one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis test was used. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied for the predictability of GRACE and TIMI scores for severity of disease. Results: A positive association between the Gensini score and vessel score was observed with both the GRACE (P = 0.001) and TIMI (P = 0.001) scores. The area under the ROC curve for the GRACE score was 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.676–0.854), significantly superior to the area under the ROC curve of the TIMI score (0.715; 95% CI = 0.618–0.812). Risk factors such as higher age, hypertension, smoking history, dyslipidemia, ECG changes such as ST deviation and T inversion, and Killip classification showed a statistically significant association with severity of disease. Conclusions: Both the GRACE and TIMI risk scores were a good predictor of angiographic severity of CAD in patients with NSTE-ACS, and the GRACE score was found to be superior to the TIMI risk score.
非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征急性冠状动脉事件和溶栓在心肌梗死风险评分中的全球登记比较
背景:急性冠状动脉事件全球登记(GRACE)和心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分在预测非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度方面尚未得到证实。目的:我们旨在比较GRACE评分和TIMI风险评分对NSTE-ACS患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)血管造影严重程度的预测。背景和设计:这是一项观察性横断面研究。对象与方法:共纳入202例NSTE- acs (NSTE心肌梗死合并不稳定型心绞痛)患者。评估GRACE和TIMI评分。行冠状动脉造影,用Gensini评分和血管评分评价冠心病的严重程度。统计分析方法:采用SPSS软件27.0进行统计分析。两个均值比较采用独立样本t检验/ Mann-Whitney u检验,两个以上均值比较采用单因素方差分析/ Kruskal-Wallis检验。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来预测GRACE和TIMI评分对疾病严重程度的影响。结果:GRACE评分(P = 0.001)和TIMI评分(P = 0.001)均与Gensini评分和血管评分呈正相关。GRACE评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.765(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.676-0.854),显著优于TIMI评分的ROC曲线下面积(0.715;95% ci = 0.618-0.812)。高龄、高血压、吸烟史、血脂异常、ST偏、T倒等心电图改变、Killip分级等危险因素与疾病严重程度的相关性有统计学意义。结论:GRACE和TIMI风险评分都是NSTE-ACS患者冠心病血管造影严重程度的良好预测指标,GRACE评分优于TIMI风险评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书