Who Is Okay? The Harm of One-Dimensional Appraisals of Women Scholars During COVID-19 & Beyond.

Advance journal (Corvallis, Ore.) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-23 DOI:10.5399/osu/advjrnl.2.3.7
Jennifer M Gómez
{"title":"Who Is Okay? The Harm of One-Dimensional Appraisals of Women Scholars During COVID-19 & Beyond.","authors":"Jennifer M Gómez","doi":"10.5399/osu/advjrnl.2.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this essay, I detail how homogenizing appraisals of diverse faculty women during COVID-19 are harmful to all, including myself. I highlight how academic demands to be \"talking heads\" and not full human beings, though not new, is especially harmful in the current era. As a Black woman faculty dealing with the double pandemic of COVID-19 and anti-Black racism, the one-dimensional appraisals of women faculty exclude me: I am not a mother dealing with sexist overburden in household responsibilities that interfere with my work. Instead, I am dealing with isolation and loneliness, which I sublimate through work productivity. Resulting in shame, I also realize that universities could operate differently, recognizing women scholars for their diversity in identities, backgrounds, responsibilities, work styles, and personalities during the pandemic and beyond. Given that work productivity is not synonymous with well-being, I hope my colleagues know that, in this moment, I am not okay.</p>","PeriodicalId":93512,"journal":{"name":"Advance journal (Corvallis, Ore.)","volume":"2 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122118/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance journal (Corvallis, Ore.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/advjrnl.2.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this essay, I detail how homogenizing appraisals of diverse faculty women during COVID-19 are harmful to all, including myself. I highlight how academic demands to be "talking heads" and not full human beings, though not new, is especially harmful in the current era. As a Black woman faculty dealing with the double pandemic of COVID-19 and anti-Black racism, the one-dimensional appraisals of women faculty exclude me: I am not a mother dealing with sexist overburden in household responsibilities that interfere with my work. Instead, I am dealing with isolation and loneliness, which I sublimate through work productivity. Resulting in shame, I also realize that universities could operate differently, recognizing women scholars for their diversity in identities, backgrounds, responsibilities, work styles, and personalities during the pandemic and beyond. Given that work productivity is not synonymous with well-being, I hope my colleagues know that, in this moment, I am not okay.

谁还好?新冠肺炎及其后女性学者一维评价的危害。
在这篇文章中,我详细介绍了在新冠肺炎期间,对不同的女教师进行同质化评估对包括我在内的所有人都是有害的。我强调,学术界要求成为“会说话的人”,而不是一个完整的人,尽管不是什么新鲜事,但在当今时代尤其有害。作为一名应对新冠肺炎和反黑人种族主义双重疫情的黑人女教师,对女教师的一维评价将我排除在外:我不是一名应对性别歧视的母亲,家庭责任负担过重,影响了我的工作。相反,我正在处理孤独和孤独,这是我通过工作效率升华的。遗憾的是,我也意识到,大学可以以不同的方式运作,承认女性学者在疫情期间及以后的身份、背景、责任、工作风格和个性方面的多样性。鉴于工作效率并不是幸福的代名词,我希望我的同事们知道,在这一刻,我不好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信