Ideological positioning in the representation of borders: an analysis of recent Hindi films

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Ritika Verma, A. Roy
{"title":"Ideological positioning in the representation of borders: an analysis of recent Hindi films","authors":"Ritika Verma, A. Roy","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2022.2086405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ideology and cinematic representation are crucially linked even though a film’s positioning of itself with respect to dominant state ideology may differ thus contesting the idea that films always serve as ideological state apparatus. In this context, the paper reflects on the complex ways in which the ideological positioning – advertently or inadvertently – of cinematic representations of Partition in Hindi films of the 2000s interacts with dominant state ideology to frame the relationship between self and other with the terms denoting India/Hindu and Pakistan/Muslim, respectively. Through an analysis of the representation of the India–Pakistan border in four films – Pinjar (2003), Veer-Zaara (2004), Uri: The Surgical Strike (2019) and Kya Dilli Kya Lahore (2014) – the paper argues that mainstream Hindi films are largely reflective of the state ideology, although to varying degrees and at times in spite of themselves. In contrast, a low-budget film as Kya Dilli Kya Lahore completely subverts the dominant ideology through its sensitive but incisive critique of the border.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"307 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2022.2086405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ideology and cinematic representation are crucially linked even though a film’s positioning of itself with respect to dominant state ideology may differ thus contesting the idea that films always serve as ideological state apparatus. In this context, the paper reflects on the complex ways in which the ideological positioning – advertently or inadvertently – of cinematic representations of Partition in Hindi films of the 2000s interacts with dominant state ideology to frame the relationship between self and other with the terms denoting India/Hindu and Pakistan/Muslim, respectively. Through an analysis of the representation of the India–Pakistan border in four films – Pinjar (2003), Veer-Zaara (2004), Uri: The Surgical Strike (2019) and Kya Dilli Kya Lahore (2014) – the paper argues that mainstream Hindi films are largely reflective of the state ideology, although to varying degrees and at times in spite of themselves. In contrast, a low-budget film as Kya Dilli Kya Lahore completely subverts the dominant ideology through its sensitive but incisive critique of the border.
边界表征中的意识形态定位——对近期印地语电影的分析
摘要意识形态和电影表现是至关重要的联系,尽管一部电影相对于占主导地位的国家意识形态的定位可能有所不同,因此对电影始终充当意识形态国家机器的观点提出了质疑。在这种背景下,本文反思了2000年代印地语电影中分治的意识形态定位——有意或无意——与占主导地位的国家意识形态相互作用的复杂方式,以分别用表示印度/印度教和巴基斯坦/穆斯林的术语来界定自我与他人之间的关系。通过分析四部电影——《平贾尔》(2003)、《维尔·扎拉》(2004)、《乌里:外科手术》(2019)和《凯亚·迪利·凯亚·拉合尔》(2014)——中对印度-巴基斯坦边境的表现,论文认为,主流印地语电影在很大程度上反映了国家意识形态,尽管在不同程度上,有时也会有所不同。相比之下,一部由凯娅·迪利·凯娅·拉哈尔(Kya Dilli Kya Lahore)主演的低成本电影通过其对边境的敏感但深刻的批判,彻底颠覆了主流意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
India Review
India Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信