National Marine Sanctuaries capture enhanced abundance and diversity of the California Current Ecosystem avifauna

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Tamara M. Russell , Angela R. Szesciorka , Trevor W. Joyce , David G. Ainley , Lisa T. Ballance
{"title":"National Marine Sanctuaries capture enhanced abundance and diversity of the California Current Ecosystem avifauna","authors":"Tamara M. Russell ,&nbsp;Angela R. Szesciorka ,&nbsp;Trevor W. Joyce ,&nbsp;David G. Ainley ,&nbsp;Lisa T. Ballance","doi":"10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying the spatial patterns of marine predators, such as seabirds, reveals areas of ecological importance and associated food web characteristics, upon which marine conservation and management plans can be based. Owing to high productivity, the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) harbors an abundant and diverse avifauna comprised of resident and migratory species. With a goal of protecting habitats in three biogeographic regions — North, Central, and South CCE — a network of marine protected areas have been designated, including five National Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). Using an extensive at-sea survey dataset (1980 to 2017), we characterize spatial patterns of seabirds, and compare mean relative abundance, diversity, and community composition both within and outside the NMSs. We found that within the CCE, seabird abundance and diversity increase linearly from south to north (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, respectively) and decrease linearly with distance from the coast (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.16 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23, respectively). The avifauna of the North and South regions are the most distinct, with the Central region being transitional between the two. The CCE avifauna shows limited overall diversity, with just 10 species contributing &gt;93% of abundance totals. In addition, certain foraging guilds and prey preference groups were dominant: pursuit-feeding and piscivorous species in the North and surface feeding generalists in the South. Overall, seabird relative abundance and diversity are higher within NMS boundaries compared to outside. Although relative abundance and diversity of seabirds within NMSs were broadly representative of corresponding biogeographic regions, the overall NMS network captures a range of distinct seabird communities. The analysis of this extensive dataset provides a better understanding of seabird spatial patterns and their ecological roles within different regions, thus facilitating more effective, adaptive management of CCE biotic resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924796323000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quantifying the spatial patterns of marine predators, such as seabirds, reveals areas of ecological importance and associated food web characteristics, upon which marine conservation and management plans can be based. Owing to high productivity, the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) harbors an abundant and diverse avifauna comprised of resident and migratory species. With a goal of protecting habitats in three biogeographic regions — North, Central, and South CCE — a network of marine protected areas have been designated, including five National Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). Using an extensive at-sea survey dataset (1980 to 2017), we characterize spatial patterns of seabirds, and compare mean relative abundance, diversity, and community composition both within and outside the NMSs. We found that within the CCE, seabird abundance and diversity increase linearly from south to north (R2 = 0.54 and R2 = 0.55, respectively) and decrease linearly with distance from the coast (R2 = 0.16 and R2 = 0.23, respectively). The avifauna of the North and South regions are the most distinct, with the Central region being transitional between the two. The CCE avifauna shows limited overall diversity, with just 10 species contributing >93% of abundance totals. In addition, certain foraging guilds and prey preference groups were dominant: pursuit-feeding and piscivorous species in the North and surface feeding generalists in the South. Overall, seabird relative abundance and diversity are higher within NMS boundaries compared to outside. Although relative abundance and diversity of seabirds within NMSs were broadly representative of corresponding biogeographic regions, the overall NMS network captures a range of distinct seabird communities. The analysis of this extensive dataset provides a better understanding of seabird spatial patterns and their ecological roles within different regions, thus facilitating more effective, adaptive management of CCE biotic resources.

国家海洋保护区捕获了加利福尼亚当前生态系统鸟类的丰富和多样性
量化海鸟等海洋捕食者的空间模式,揭示了具有生态重要性的区域和相关的食物网特征,海洋保护和管理计划可以以此为基础。由于生产力高,加州洋流生态系统(CCE)拥有丰富多样的鸟类,包括常驻物种和迁徙物种。为了保护CCE北部、中部和南部三个生物地理区域的栖息地,已经指定了一个海洋保护区网络,包括五个国家海洋保护区(NMS)。使用广泛的海上调查数据集(1980年至2017年),我们描述了海鸟的空间模式,并比较了NMS内外的平均相对丰度、多样性和群落组成。我们发现,在CCE内,海鸟的丰度和多样性从南到北呈线性增加(R2=0.54和R2=0.55),并随着距离海岸的距离呈线性减少(R2=0.16和R2=0.23)。北部和南部地区的鸟类区系最为独特,中部地区介于两者之间。CCE鸟类显示出有限的整体多样性,只有10个物种贡献>;丰度总量的93%。此外,某些觅食群体和猎物偏好群体占主导地位:北方的捕食性和食豆性物种,南方的表食性多面手。总体而言,与外部相比,NMS边界内的海鸟相对丰度和多样性更高。尽管NMS内海鸟的相对丰度和多样性广泛代表了相应的生物地理区域,但整个NMS网络捕捉到了一系列不同的海鸟群落。对这一广泛数据集的分析可以更好地了解海鸟的空间模式及其在不同地区的生态作用,从而促进对CCE生物资源的更有效、适应性管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信