Improving the assessment of the diversification of construction companies

Q2 Engineering
R. Ginevičius
{"title":"Improving the assessment of the diversification of construction companies","authors":"R. Ginevičius","doi":"10.2478/emj-2023-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Various indicators are used to determine the level of company diversification. Their adequacy largely depends on the structure of the production programme. Its essential feature is the comparative weight of the main product in the total scope of the company’s work. In this situation, the intensity of the diversification process is reflected by the decrease in the volume of this product due to the inclusion of new products in the production programme. In this case, the adequacy of the diversification indicator can be reflected by comparing the scale of the main product with changes in the value of these indicators. The adequacy will be higher with more changes in the values of diversification indicators corresponding to changes in the volumes of the main product. Four indicators of corporate diversification are the most well-known and widely used: the Berry index, the entropy measure, Utton’s measure and the DG index. All of them have both strong and weak sides, so it is important to determine situations of the company’s production programme in which diversification indicators are appropriate to use, i.e., in which situations their adequacy is the greatest. The research has established that if the comparative weight of the main product of the production programme in the total scope of work is greater than 0.5, then the adequacy of the entropy measure and index DG is higher compared to the Berry index and Utton’s measure. If it is lower than 0.5, the other two diversification indicators should be used. The obtained results will help to more efficiently manage the process of diversification as a company’s development strategy.","PeriodicalId":37237,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","volume":"15 1","pages":"46 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Various indicators are used to determine the level of company diversification. Their adequacy largely depends on the structure of the production programme. Its essential feature is the comparative weight of the main product in the total scope of the company’s work. In this situation, the intensity of the diversification process is reflected by the decrease in the volume of this product due to the inclusion of new products in the production programme. In this case, the adequacy of the diversification indicator can be reflected by comparing the scale of the main product with changes in the value of these indicators. The adequacy will be higher with more changes in the values of diversification indicators corresponding to changes in the volumes of the main product. Four indicators of corporate diversification are the most well-known and widely used: the Berry index, the entropy measure, Utton’s measure and the DG index. All of them have both strong and weak sides, so it is important to determine situations of the company’s production programme in which diversification indicators are appropriate to use, i.e., in which situations their adequacy is the greatest. The research has established that if the comparative weight of the main product of the production programme in the total scope of work is greater than 0.5, then the adequacy of the entropy measure and index DG is higher compared to the Berry index and Utton’s measure. If it is lower than 0.5, the other two diversification indicators should be used. The obtained results will help to more efficiently manage the process of diversification as a company’s development strategy.
完善建筑企业多元化评价
摘要企业多元化经营水平的衡量指标有很多。它们是否充足在很大程度上取决于生产方案的结构。其本质特征是主要产品在公司总工作范围内的相对权重。在这种情况下,由于将新产品列入生产方案,这种产品的数量减少,反映了多样化进程的强度。在这种情况下,可以通过比较主要产品的规模和这些指标值的变化来反映多样化指标的充分性。与主要产品数量变化相对应的多样化指标值变化越多,充分性就越高。公司多元化的四个指标是最著名和最广泛使用的:贝瑞指数、熵测度、乌顿测度和DG指数。所有这些指标都有优点和缺点,因此确定公司的生产方案在哪些情况下适合使用多样化指标,即在哪些情况下多样化指标的充分性最大是很重要的。研究表明,如果生产方案的主要产品在总工作范围内的相对权重大于0.5,则熵测度和指数DG的充分性高于贝里指数和乌顿测度。如果低于0.5,则应使用其他两个多元化指标。所得结果将有助于更有效地管理作为公司发展战略的多元化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Management in Production and Services
Engineering Management in Production and Services Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信